 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Altschuler v. Town of Wallingford, CV020466846S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A property owner had not met his burden of proof in contesting a town's assessment of his property's value where the property owner had applied for a loan and stated the value of the house was greater than the amount used for the town's assessment.
|
|||||
| Arthur M. Seigel M.D., P.C. v. Nationwide Ins. Co., CV020470480S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where insured party never previously complained of radiating numbness but doctor argued that he referred insured party to have MRI based upon this complaint, trial court accepted insurer's argument that MRI was not medically necessary.
|
|||||
| Biello v. Town of Watertown, CV990155286S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Town's summary judgment motion was denied as to an employee's claims alleging breach of an implied contract and implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, as there was a triable issue of fact on whether an implied contract was formed.
|
|||||
| Daconto v. Trumbull Hous. Auth., CV030399811,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a former employee's 10-count complaint stemming from his termination, his invasion of privacy claim was struck because the acts of "publication" of false allegations about him as pleaded did not meet the requisite standard of communication.
|
|||||
| Ehrenreich v. Mohawk Mt. Ski Area, Inc., CV030090988S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ski area's motion to implead a third-party defendant was denied, as the indemnification provision in the contract did not contain express language releasing the ski area from its own negligent or wanton and reckless conduct.
|
|||||
| Ledbetter v. Warden, 560779,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner failed to show that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek credit for pretrial confinement because, as a sentenced prisoner, petitioner might not have been entitled to credit for time served prior to trial.
|
|||||
| Ledbetter v. Warden, Corrigan, C.I., 560779,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Linsley Elec. v. Rua, CV030080726S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, GEOGRAPHIC AREA 5 AT DERBY, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Electrical contractor was entitled to money damages for breach of contract and for a foreclosure on its mechanic's lien where it was "thrown off" a job that was 90 percent complete and none of the contract payments for the work had been made.
|
|||||
| MMG Ins. Co. v. Church, 566314,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut law applied as it had greater contact with the parties; Connecticut's interest in applying its standards of conduct to govern the liability of those who used its highways was significant because the car accident occurred in Connecticut.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
