 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Beaton, CR 9592040,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT WINDHAM, SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION, January 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed petitioner's sentence for robbery and kidnapping because it was reasonable given that the serious and violent crimes required an appropriately severe sentence.
|
|||||
| State v. Filipov, 648-99-0016,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT NORWALK, FAMILY SUPPORT MAGISTRATE DIVISION, January 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer was ordered to withhold support payments from employee's wages since employer met definition of "employer" under Connecticut's support withholding law.
|
|||||
| State v. Martin, CR 1386346,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT ENFIELD, January 31, 2000, Decided , January 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A defendant, whose probation was suspended pursuant to an automatic stay pending appeal, could not subsequently claim prejudice as a result of the delay following completion of her appeal.
|
|||||
| Van Eck v. Town of E. Haven Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV 980413752,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fines for zoning violations were not upheld, when defendant's interpretation of the zoning regulations to plaintiffs' violations was not in accordance with the natural meaning of the regulations, and the fines were excessive.
|
|||||
| Weathers v. Maslar, CV 990088674,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 31, 2000, Decided , January 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's claim for failure to state a cause of action; the claim was for breach of a promise to marry and for alienation of affections under a contractual analysis.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
