|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 26, 2001
|
| |
Lodevick v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Ridgefield, CV000339052S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 26, 2001, Decided , January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Plaintiffs were required to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that in granting a variance for zoning regulation, the zoning board acted capriciously or in disregard for local zoning regulations.
|
|
| |
Ocwen Fed. Bank v. Busby, CV980166790S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 26, 2001, Decided , January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Despite the fact that a creditor's affidavit of his claim to the proceeds from a foreclosure sale was not certified, it was still valid for the purposes of serving notice to other parties of the creditor's claim.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Predom v. Hadfield, 419156,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 26, 2001, Decided , January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motor company was entitled to summary judgment in claimants' product liability action because motor company sustained its burden of showing that the air bag in question was not defective, and claimants failed to produce expert evidence that it was.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Shashaty v. Warden, 556702, 556703,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 26, 2001, Decided , January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
State v. Herbette, CR9831759,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 26, 2001, Decided , January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The court granted plaintiff State's motion in limine seeking to admit evidence of a previous sexual assault committed by defendant against a minor child, because the evidence was probative of a common design or plan by defendant.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|