|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 11, 2002
|
| |
Maderia v. Northeast Utils. Serv. Co., X04CV000120723S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW LONDON, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Failure to exhaust administrative remedies was jurisdictional defect. Claims asking to prohibit operations and conversion at nuclear power plant were dismissed, as plaintiffs failed to exhaust administrative remedies.
|
|
| |
Marfo v. Hagan, FA000159741S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court found that parties were validly married according to Ghana's customary law. Wife was granted pendente lite attorneys fees where most of her reasonable attorneys fees were incurred due to husband's challenge to marriage's validity.
|
|
| |
McMahon v. Johns, FA900371995S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Me. Drilling & Blasting v. Hychko, CV000159852S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Quarry owner's claim that he refused to pay for blasting services of quarry blasting corporation because he incurred expenses in breaking up oversized rock was not credible; such expenses were anticipated by parties' contract.
|
|
| |
Nat'l City Mortg. v. Rogers, CV9886991S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A loan company and a title company's summary judgment motions were denied; while a note and mortgage were executed by power of attorney, the summary judgment affidavit was not accompanied by a copy of the power of attorney recorded with a deed.
|
|
| |
Nosik v. Mastronardi, CV00379088S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In legal malpractice action, court granted summary judgment as to tort claims where they were barred by applicable statutes of limitation and continuing course of conduct doctrine did not apply. Client sufficiently alleged breach of contract.
|
|
| |
Progressive Northwestern Ins. Co. v. Stoleson, X05CV980168089S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Insurer had no obligation to defend or indemnify insured where vehicle operated by insured at time of accident was not listed on insurance policy declarations page and insured did not have permission of owner to operate vehicle.
|
|
| |
State v. Camera, CR7184309,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Wentland v. Am. Equity, CV000504557S, CV000504903, CV000504453,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where allegations of alcohol were integral to and inseparable from negligence allegations in suit against bar, liquor liability exclusion applied to preclude insurance coverage. Summary judgment was entered in favor of insurance carrier.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback