|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 30, 2003
|
| |
Metro. Dist. Comm'n v. Local 184, Council 4, Afscme, CV990594293S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 30, 2003, Decided , January 30, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court denied employer's application to vacate arbitration award that required employer to reinstate employee who aided another in improperly dumping waste materials contrary to employer's rules, as enforcing award did not violate public policy.
|
|
| |
Monaco v. Simkins Indus., CV020462732,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 30, 2003, Decided , January 30, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Orzel v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 557841,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 30, 2003, Decided , January 30, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where Zoning Board of Appeals (Connecticut) gave improper, but clear, reasons for its decision, superior court did not have to review record for other reasons to support decision before deciding landowners' appeal. Motion to open judgment was denied.
|
|
| |
State v. Falcon, CR970029972S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 22 AT MILFORD, January 30, 2003, Decided , January 30, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Since judgment had been rendered and defendant had served his sentence, the court was without jurisdiction to consider the merits of defendant's motions to reopen the matter and to withdraw his guilty plea.
|
|
| |
State v. Grant, CR95422899,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 30, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Taking into consideration the violent nature of defendant's crime, his criminal history, and the lack of any acknowledgment for the offense, the sentence imposed was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback