|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 30, 2004
|
| |
Martinez v. Dep't of Pub. Safety, CV00377191S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: As a police department did not have a vested right in prior legislative phraseology or in pending litigation, entering a final order and completing a judgment was not proper where the legislature amended an indemnification law after a court ruling.
|
|
| |
McCarthy v. Lamond, CV010085215,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Automobile lessor's motion to strike a driver's special defenses was granted; mistake, ambiguity, fraud, and unconscionability claims were unsupported by the facts.
|
|
| |
|
| |
O'Brien v. Stolt-Nielsen Transp. Group, Ltd., X08CV020190051,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT STAMFORD, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: New York-licensed in-house counsel to Connecticut corporation was bound by New York's stricter rules of client confidentiality in an action claiming wrongful constructive discharge based on corporate demands for unethical behavior.
|
|
| |
Plourde v. Hartford Hosp., CV020814180,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where individual placed privileged peer review document in decedent's file and gave file to estate administrator's counsel, disclosure was not inadvertent; individual's placement of document in file exhibited that he believed that it belonged there.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State v. McEwen, CR0071049, CR0070622, CR0070803, CR0070972, CR0071603, CR0070623, CR0070971, CR0071215,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 19 AT ROCKVILLE, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A 12-year sentence plus six years of parole was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate, as defendant's offenses, which occurred over a 90-day period, included robberies, burglaries, and assaults and constituted a reign of terror.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback