 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Martinez v. Dep't of Pub. Safety, CV00377191S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As a police department did not have a vested right in prior legislative phraseology or in pending litigation, entering a final order and completing a judgment was not proper where the legislature amended an indemnification law after a court ruling.
|
|||||
| McCarthy v. Lamond, CV010085215,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Automobile lessor's motion to strike a driver's special defenses was granted; mistake, ambiguity, fraud, and unconscionability claims were unsupported by the facts.
|
|||||
| Michalek v. Zoning Comm'n of Plainville, CV030520712,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Intervenor's appeal of a grant of a site plan application by a zoning commission was dismissed; the intervenor lacked standing to appeal, as such an appeal by an intervenor had to be joined with an appeal otherwise permitted by statute.
|
|||||
| O'Brien v. Stolt-Nielsen Transp. Group, Ltd., X08CV020190051,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT STAMFORD, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: New York-licensed in-house counsel to Connecticut corporation was bound by New York's stricter rules of client confidentiality in an action claiming wrongful constructive discharge based on corporate demands for unethical behavior.
|
|||||
| Plourde v. Hartford Hosp., CV020814180,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 30, 2004, Decided , January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where individual placed privileged peer review document in decedent's file and gave file to estate administrator's counsel, disclosure was not inadvertent; individual's placement of document in file exhibited that he believed that it belonged there.
|
|||||
| Preston v. Chartkoff, CV0020071112S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, GEOGRAPHIC AREA 5 AT DERBY, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owner's claims against insurance broker for failing to procure insurance for a contractor working at the owner's home failed; there was no agency relationship between the owner and the broker, and thus, the broker owed no duty to the owner.
|
|||||
| Sasso v. Sasso, FA020515358,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 30, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Both the husband an wife were at fault for the irretrievable breakdown of their marriage where the husband constantly denied the wife of physical affection and the wife subsequently committed adultery; thus, the marriage was dissolved.
|
|||||
| State v. Booth, CR95226745,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's 60-month sentence for a gang related murder was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate to the crime where it was the culmination of a persistent, escalating, and violent criminal history.
|
|||||
| State v. Gomez, CR10230269,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fifty-year sentence for murder of member of different gang for driving getaway car and cover-up was affirmed as indication of how serious murder conviction was; sentence was in accord with practice book and not inappropriate or disproportionate.
|
|||||
| State v. McEwen, CR0071049, CR0070622, CR0070803, CR0070972, CR0071603, CR0070623, CR0070971, CR0071215,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 19 AT ROCKVILLE, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A 12-year sentence plus six years of parole was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate, as defendant's offenses, which occurred over a 90-day period, included robberies, burglaries, and assaults and constituted a reign of terror.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
