 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Mooney, CR97131251,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Taking into consideration petitioner's extensive felony history, his inability to cooperate with any degree of probationary supervision, and the violent and horrendous nature of the crime, his sentence was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate.
|
|||||
| State v. Nicholson, CR99277467,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner was not entitled to a sentence reduction where there was ample evidence justifying his 10-year sentence as a persistent felony offender, though the base conviction was only for third degree robbery, which carried a five-year maximum.
|
|||||
| State v. Quint, CR0246523, CR0246892,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA-MILFORD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 22 AT MILFORD, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Six-year sentence for three violations of a protective order and criminal trespasses was affirmed as it was not disproportionate or inappropriate. Defendant committed crimes while on probation and did not take responsibility for actions.
|
|||||
| State v. Rios, CR98471763,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 36-year sentence for conspiracy to commit robbery, attempted robbery, and three assaults was neither disproportionate nor inappropriate as 21-year-old defendant shot three people for no apparent reason.
|
|||||
| State v. Romero, CR96253404,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence imposed for sexual assault and risk of injury convictions was upheld where sentencing court clearly considered all salient factors prior to sentencing, which included prior criminal history or lack thereof and nature of offenses committed.
|
|||||
| State v. Slimskey, CR95154090,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 15 AT NEW BRITAIN, January 30, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Revocation of defendant's probation and commitment to Connecticut Commissioners of Correction for violating special condition of probation by renting series of sexually explicit videos was affirmed as it was not disproportionate or inappropriate.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
