 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adrian C., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 1, 2000, Decided , February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition to terminate parental rights of both parents granted because agency proved abandonment, and failure to rehabilitate by clear and convincing evidence.
|
|||||
| Arsenault v. State Comm'r of Transp., 052117,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court awarded judgment for plaintiff property owner in an amount that it determined the subject property's value decreased due to defendant Commissioner of Transportation's taking of a perpetual highway easement.
|
|||||
| Birch v. Birch, FA 990066730S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 1, 2000, Decided , February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court dissolved a marriage and ordered the division of property, joint legal custody, visitation, child support, and alimony, with no finding of fault with either party.
|
|||||
| Brooks v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n of Haddam, CV 980086661S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 1, 2000, Decided , February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Members of planning and zoning commission did not have a material conflict of interest, to find otherwise would be to seriously limit the work of municipalities, who must rely on interested volunteers for much of their work.
|
|||||
| Cornelio v. Stamford Hosp., XO5CV 970160804S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 1, 2000, Decided , February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Various counts were struck from plaintiff's negligence action against defendant hospital over pap smear interpretation; defendant hospital had right to retain pathology slides that cannot be duplicated.
|
|||||
| Dale C., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 1, 2000, Decided , February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Applying statutory criteria, court terminated parents' parental rights based on parents' failure to achieve requisite degree of personal rehabilitation, abandonment of children and lack of ongoing parent-child relationships.
|
|||||
| Darveau v. Lucas, CV 970567237,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motions to set aside the verdict and for additur, filed after the jury awarded economic damages, but no noneconomic damages, were denied because the verdict was not clearly contradicted by the evidence.
|
|||||
| David A. Altschuler v. City of West Haven, 970405575S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 1, 2000, Decided , February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property taken by city in condemnation proceeding was valued, and city was required to pay the deficiency between property's fair value and amount already deposited.
|
|||||
| Duhaime v. Darien Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV 990494534,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court dismissed one matter and denied dismissal of the second matter because plaintiff failed to effectuate service and failed to file a revised complaint as directed by the court.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
