 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Anastasio v. Ladd, CV000160470,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 29, 2001, Decided , January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Intoxicated driver's pure assumption of risk (abolished by Connecticut) special defense was not a sufficient comparative negligence special defense because if failed to allege any negligence on plaintiff passenger's part. Thus it was stricken.
|
|||||
| Ansonia Acquisitions II v. Town of Ledyard Wpca, 120133,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff was entitled to a refund of overpayments because its apartment complex was erroneously classified and charged a commercial rate for water and sewer, and plaintiff did not contribute to the overpayment.
|
|||||
| Breton v. Stamps, FA0073423S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 29, 2001, Decided , January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Woman who alleged that child had resided with her for three years, that she was child's godmother, that she had made numerous purchases for child, and administered chemotherapy treatments to child, had standing to sue for visitation rights.
|
|||||
| Chieffo v. Yannielli, CV000159940,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 29, 2001, Decided , January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied a motion to strike plaintiffs' allegations of recklessness and prayer for double or treble damages under a statute. The claims were adequately pled in the auto accident injury suit.
|
|||||
| Fort Trumbull Conservancy v. City of New London, 555599,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Complaint failed to allege sufficient facts to support inference of environmental damage; therefore, there was no standing to bring suit. There was no subject matter jurisdiction where there had been a failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
|
|||||
| Fournier v. Gomes, CV99068280,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 29, 2001, Decided , January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Owners of premises and independent contractor they hired for snow removal owed concurrent duties, one under premises liability and one under ordinary negligence principles, to business invitee injured in fall on the ice.
|
|||||
| Lafleur v. St. Francis Hosp. & Med. Ctr., CV960565398,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a medical expert did not testify, plaintiff's counsel was unable to question him about his preparation time, and there was no way to determine if the time charged was reasonable, a defendant could not have recovered money for the time.
|
|||||
| Lake v. Whelan, CV990337163S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 29, 2001, Decided , January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant provided only uncertified copies of excerpts of deposition transcripts to support his motion for summary judgment, those items did not constitute proof of documentary evidence supporting motion; thus motion was denied.
|
|||||
| Mallozzi v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., CV000374101S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurance company's motion for summary judgment was denied, since there was an issue of material fact as to whether the owner of the vehicle involved in the accident was the employer of the insured, in which case there would not be coverage.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
