 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Admin. & Residual Emples. Union v. State, CV010803832,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 29, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because union did not raise objection to arbitrability and did not move to vacate, modify, or correct arbitration award, but instead filed declaratory action, court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| BAILLARGEON v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION, (AC 20729),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 29, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Habeas corpus relief was properly denied where defendant failed to show ineffective assistance of counsel. Although sentencing counsel was deficient, and not adequately prepared, defendant did not show actual prejudice.
|
|||||
| Boardman v. Webb, CV010448197S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 29, 2002, Decided , January 29, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claim of negligent misrepresentation regarding condition of real estate did not fall within actions stated in apportionment statute. Where claims sought to recover economic losses, they fell outside of scope of apportionment statute.
|
|||||
| Bostick v. City of Willimantic, CV010065265S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 29, 2002, Decided , January 29, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court dismissed action filed against State of Connecticut by woman who fell on ice outside building State leased and by her husband, and also granted town's motion to strike plaintiffs' claims for common law nuisance and loss of consortium.
|
|||||
| City of Hartford v. Hartford Mun. Emples. Ass'n, (SC 16507), (SC 16508),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 29, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Supreme court reversed judgment which had reversed state board of labor relation's decision that city employer failed to comply with previous grievance settlement regarding flexible time policy for its employees.
|
|||||
| Crockett v. Pastore, (SC 16481),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 29, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the grandmother failed to allege and establish that she had a parent-like relationship with the child and the child would suffer real and significant harm if visitation were denied, her petition for visitation should have been denied.
|
|||||
| Drennan v. Geist, CV990089114,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 29, 2002, Decided , January 29, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Whether the counts were construed as claims for reckless or intentional infliction of emotional distress was irrelevant since they did not specify conduct that was reckless or intentional, rather they merely stated conclusions.
|
|||||
| Grunsell v. Saaf, CV000338514S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 29, 2002, Decided , January 29, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was reasonable for the lessor to commence the remedial action when he did. The covenants of the lease were independent and the lessor's alleged failure to perform did not excuse the lessee from her obligation to pay rent.
|
|||||
| Hornat v. Mercure, BS2075F/96,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, FAMILY SUPPORT MAGISTRATE DIVISION AT HARTFORD, January 29, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court modified mother's child support to zero. She carried her burden to prove she had total bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, and sleep disorder disability and only excludable Social Security disability income and no earning potential.
|
|||||
| In re Latifa K., (AC 20950),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 29, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where mother and father's parental rights were terminated, trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to amend termination petitions, and father failed to establish admission of sentence in social study was harmful.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
