|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 2, 2004
|
| |
|
| |
Cardarelli v. Middlesex Mut. Assur. Co., CV020190417S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 2, 2004, Decided , February 2, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Summary judgment based on late notification of intent to file a UIM claim was precluded; insured's interrogatory answer giving the date of notification was not a judicial admission, and other conflicting evidence on the issue created a fact question.
|
|
| |
Giglio v. Esposito, CV020173802S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 2, 2004, Decided , February 2, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court granted motion to dismiss woman's action against man who had died by the time that service of process was attempted; whether couched as lack of subject matter or personal jurisdiction, trial court did not have jurisdiction.
|
|
| |
Grasso v. City of New Haven, CV020465190,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 2, 2004, Decided , February 2, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: An expert real estate appraiser was to be compensated at his regular hourly charge, the reasonableness of which was not disputed by the losing party. It was also reasonable to include compensation for time spent preparing to testify in the matter.
|
|
| |
Hilliard v. Adm'r, 565998,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 2, 2004, Decided , February 2, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A worker's compensation review board properly determined that a claimant was not entitled to unemployment benefits because the employer discharged the claimant for willful misconduct due to the claimant's failure to follow the employer's directive.
|
|
| |
Invotech, LLC v. Anderson, CV020820978S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 2, 2004, Decided , February 2, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where two parties' agreement was comprised of three documents, two of which were silent as to arbitration and one of which expressly referred all disputes to arbitration, a motion to stay litigation in favor of binding arbitration was granted.
|
|
| |
Jacobs v. Kirshenbaum, CV020818386,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 2, 2004, Decided , February 2, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendants' motion to strike was granted as to claims of breach of express and implied warranties in a medical malpractice action; the claims failed to allege that the parties contracted for a specific result arising from prenatal care.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback