|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - December 20, 1999
|
| |
Lindholm v. Lindholm, FA 980167299S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, December 20, 1999, Decided , December 20, 1999, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Mobil v. Southington Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV 990498474S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, December 20, 1999, Decided , December 20, 1999, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where plaintiffs failed to establish that they were aggrieved by a site application plan for a renovated gas station located near plaintiffs' gas station, their appeal was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Sheetz v. Sheetz, FA 990173524S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, December 20, 1999, Decided , December 20, 1999, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Ucci v. Ucci, FA 990170487S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, December 20, 1999, Decided , December 20, 1999, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Wasilewski v. Wasilewski, FA 980165702S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, December 20, 1999, Decided , December 20, 1999, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The marriage between plaintiff wife and defendant husband was dissolved on the grounds of an irretrievable breakdown and a decree of dissolution was entered.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
