 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fagan v. Amex Assur. Co., CV 970575896S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The jury's conclusions that more likely than not the other vehicle involved in an accident was an uninsured motor vehicle and that the other possibilities of insurance were not very probable were not unreasonable.
|
|||||
| Fedor v. Taylor, CV 980163373,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 1, 2000, Decided , February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's application for appointment of a receiver was granted because the court had jurisdiction to enforce a receivership during an appeal because it was not subject to the automatic stay provisions.
|
|||||
| Hospitality Sys. v. Oriental World Trading Co., CV 990169927,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 1, 2000, Decided , February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant, a foreign corporation, was not transacting business within state for purposes of long arm statute. Thus, motion to dismiss plaintiff's breach of contract action for lack of personal jurisdiction was granted.
|
|||||
| In re Felicia B., (AC 19122),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of custody or visitation for paternal relatives was upheld as they could not safeguard and provide care in children's best interests when they believed that father did not sexually abuse the children.
|
|||||
| Jones v. Chapel Square Mall of New Haven, CV 990423606,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 1, 2000, Decided , February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In negligence case, defendant's failure to serve copy of apportionment complaint upon plaintiff tolled limitations period within which plaintiff had to file apportionment complaint against apportionment defendants.
|
|||||
| Magee v. Charmoy, CV 980167068,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 1, 2000, Decided , February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney and law firm were granted summary judgment as to Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) claim asserted by former client because professional negligence claims did not fall under CUTPA.
|
|||||
| Nemhard v. Commissioner of Correction, (AC 18472),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| New Milford Sav. Bank v. Mulville, (AC 19964), (AC 19966),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Successful bidder at the foreclosure sale could be added as a party to the appeals challenging the approval of the sale and deed, because he had a direct and immediate interest in the outcome of the appeals.
|
|||||
| Patchell v. Heffernan, 425945,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 1, 2000, Decided , February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In conservatorship matter where probate court appointed attorney to represent patient, court affirmed attorney fees award against patient's estate; estate made no showing of inability to pay requiring state reimbursement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
