 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Motuzick v. Yankee Rest., Inc., CV97O478806S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 29, 2001, Decided , January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Owner of restaurant and bar did not breach duty to customer injured in a fight where assailant was generally nonbelligerent for over an hour before fight, and owner asked assailant to leave when he became aware parties were arguing.
|
|||||
| Orozco v. Groll, CV000499892S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 29, 2001, Decided , January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs failed to contradict car rental agency's motion for summary judgment based on its claim of non-liability because driver of rental car was not authorized to drive pursuant to the rental agreement.
|
|||||
| State v. Carpenter, CR99250705,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 29, 2001, Decided , January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to disqualify the state's attorney's office because of the possibility of calling the state's attorney as a witness was denied because the claim that the state's attorney's testimony was necessary was speculative.
|
|||||
| State v. Gomez, CR00255829,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 10, January 29, 2001, Decided , January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police who knew defendant was driving under suspension had reasonable suspicion for traffic stop, even though they initially believed he was his brother, also under suspension, who was actively being sought that day.
|
|||||
| Yellow Page Consultants v. Regal Carpet Cleaning Co., CV000803982S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 29, 2001, Decided , January 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where arbitrator made decision within 30 days after deadline for parties' submissions, award was timely under statute. Award was untimely under agreement, but defendant did not timely move to vacate, so court lacked jurisdiction to hear claim.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
