 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Jacobson v. Jacobson, FA980164084S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 29, 2002, Decided , January 29, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a divorce action, the parties' marriage was dissolved on grounds of irretrievable breakdown to which both parties had contributed, the wife was awarded a lump sum of $ 50,000, and the court divided the parties' real and personal property.
|
|||||
| Knutson Mortg. Corp. v. Bernier, (AC 21424),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 29, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: One may have two or more places of residence and each may be usual place of abode. Service of process was valid if made in either of usual places of abode. Default based on abode service was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Kriz v. Coldwell Banker Real Estate, (AC 19745),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 29, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: By granting motion for directed verdict, trial court improperly concluded that jury reasonably could not have made finding regarding what was disputed fact relating to exclusive possession and control under commercial lease.
|
|||||
| MITCHELL v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION, (AC 19689),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 29, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's claim failed because it was not an underlying claim in the habeas petition before the habeas court. It was not, therefore, within the appellate court's scope of review of the habeas court's decision to deny permission to appeal.
|
|||||
| Mvb Custom Design & Constr. v. Jones, CV010183779,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 29, 2002, Decided , January 29, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A realtor's motion to strike a builder's claim alleging unjust enrichment was stricken, because while the builder clearly alleged a detriment from the realtor's action, the builder failed to clearly allege the realtor's purported benefit.
|
|||||
| Na-Mor, Inc. v. Conn. Dep't of Pub. Health, CV010508035S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 29, 2002, Decided , January 29, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Company abandoned its constitutional and ex parte communication claims. Department's application of "specific circumstances" exception was reasonable. Hearing officer did not err.
|
|||||
| New Haven Sav. Bank v. Mongillo, (AC 20299),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 29, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly granted bank's motion for approval of foreclosure report, sale, and deed; appellate court declined to review owner's claims of trial error, as owner failed to provide an adequate record on appeal.
|
|||||
| Nizzardo v. State Traffic Comm'n, (SC 16239),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 29, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Supreme court affirmed judgment denying motion to intervene to raise environmental issues in shopping center's request from highway commission for certificate that its operation would not imperil public safety. Commission lacked jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Olynciw v. Stop & Shop Cos., (AC 21070),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 29, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: General verdict rule provided that, if jury rendered general verdict, and no party requested interrogatories, it was presumed that jury found every issue in favor of prevailing party. Appellate court would not review general verdict.
|
|||||
| Roth v. Weston, (SC 16565),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 29, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Supreme court reversed judgment, allowing maternal grandmother's and aunt's visitation of father's children, since father was not shown unfit, children were not shown to be harmed by no visitation, and plaintiffs were not parent-like.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
