 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cocozza v. Cocozza, FA010343281S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 31, 2003, Decided , January 31, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Due to the wife's unreasonable consumption of alcohol and excessive speed while driving her children, the custody order was modified to require the wife to refrain from drinking alcohol prior to, and while the children were in her custody.
|
|||||
| Comm'r of Transp. v. Conn. Shellfish Co., CV000438539,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 31, 2003, Decided , January 31, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an eminent domain action, the transportation commissioner, in assessing the value of the property, failed to take into account the ecological damage to the surrounding portion of property, thereby rendering it a total taking of the property.
|
|||||
| Ed Steben Glass Co. v. United States Auto Ass'n Cas. Ins. Co., CV0100811947S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 31, 2003, Decided , January 31, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was denied where there were fact issues outstanding regarding whether a glass company's performance of services amounted to an implied contract to accept payment for services in accordance with a price schedule mailed by insurer.
|
|||||
| Larson v. Larson, FA020187311,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 31, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The parties were divorced, as the marriage had broken down irretrievably based upon the husband's infidelity, and the court entered orders dividing the marital property and requiring the husband to pay child support and alimony to the wife.
|
|||||
| Manzo v. Anthony's Ocean View, CV000442252S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 31, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the indemnity language in a catering contract did not contain the word "negligence," it did not clearly, unequivocally, specifically, and unmistakably expresses the parties' intention to exculpate the caterer from its own negligence.
|
|||||
| Sirotenko v. Adm'r, Unemployment Comp. Act, CV020391827,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 31, 2003, Decided , January 31, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Cerreta, CR98142992,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 31, 2003, Decided , January 31, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The wife testified that the substance of the communication was that she was to talk to her sister about the husband's situation. Thus, the evidence showed that the information was conveyed to a third party and was not intended to be private.
|
|||||
| Vitti v. Vitti, FA870291486S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 31, 2003, Decided , January 31, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A father was found in contempt for failing to pay a child's educational expenses as required by a divorce decree, as the court determined that the father was reasonably financially able to pay the college expenses in question.
|
|||||
| Watts v. Adm'r, Unemployment Comp. Act, CV02393581,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 31, 2003, Decided , January 31, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
