 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cuseo v. Aquent, Inc., CV040568982,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 31, 2005, Decided , January 31, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The language in an arbitration clause contained within an employment contract that any claim or controversy related to the agreement was subject to arbitration included a former employee's tort claims for tortious interference, slander, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and breach of covenant under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-409.
|
|||||
| Doe v. City of Stamford, CV020190604,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 31, 2005, Decided , January 31, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A complaint failed to allege that a criminal attack on a minor was created by some positive act by the city as there was no logical nexus, in the context of a public nuisance claim, by which to attribute the criminal acts of the perpetrator to the building and maintenance of the park pavilion and restrooms by the city.
|
|||||
| Fleming, LLC v. NRC Group, LLC, 128667,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment in an action alleging breach of contract and other claims because there was a triable issue of fact as to whether a contract for plumbing work existed between a contractor and companies.
|
|||||
| Gresczyk v. Landis, CV044004887S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 31, 2005, Decided , January 31, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action to enjoin the development of certain farmland, absent any facts to support six special defenses, specifically a lack of standing, laches, res judicata, a RICO violation, unclean hands, and jurisdiction, the Commissioner of Agriculture's motion to strike the same was granted. But an inverse condemnation counterclaim remained viable.
|
|||||
| Hudson United Bank v. Endeavor Group, CV010386572,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 31, 2005, Decided , January 31, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff bank, in accordance with the recommendation of the attorney trial referee, because a guarantor's obligation under a guaranty had not been terminated by the merger of plaintiff bank with another bank, notwithstanding the fact that it took place after he entered into the guaranty.
|
|||||
| Jordan v. Town of Haddam, CV030102282S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 31, 2005, Decided , January 31, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A town was not negligent by operating a wide snow plow on a narrow road, and a vehicle owner was not entitled to property damages as a result of a collision between his car and the snow plow.
|
|||||
| Keena v. Cordner, CV990268787S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 31, 2005, Decided , January 31, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a patient's professional negligence case alleging that chiropractor violated professional standard of care pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-184c when he pounded on her right side, causing her to suffer a herniated disc, patient did not carry her burden of proof. It was just as likely that herniation occurred when she injured her back at picnic.
|
|||||
| Marks v. Matuelvich, CV020099337S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 31, 2005, Decided , January 31, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court awarded judgment to plaintiffs on their adverse possession claim against defendants because plaintiffs possessed the disputed property for more than 15 years by an open, visible, exclusive possession under a claim of right with the intent to use the property as their own; defendants never objected to plaintiffs' use of the disputed area.
|
|||||
| Nation v. Allstate Ins. , CV040093456S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 31, 2005, Decided , January 31, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Heating oil company's motion to strike a homeowner's claim alleging a violation of CUTPA, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110b(a), was denied; as alleged misrepresentations about the company's ability to make a fuel delivery were within a business context, the owner sufficiently pled a CUTPA claim.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
