 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sender v. Sender, (AC 18626),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute did not give probate court over custodial funds and superior court jurisdiction was not limited so superior court's contempt finding was proper where defendant refused to restore funds contrary to its order.
|
|||||
| Senior v. Department of Soc. Servs., (AC 19153),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Ashby, (AC 19506),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Brocuglio, (AC 18521),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction reversed because court improperly excluded as irrelevant defendant's proffered evidence regarding victim's behavior as aggressor and that exclusion more probably than not affected the result of the trial.
|
|||||
| State v. Gordon, (AC 18143),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where photographic array of possible perpetrators was not unduly suggestive and officers did not influence witness, defendant failed to show identification resulted from unconstitutional police procedure, and denial of suppression motion was proper.
|
|||||
| State v. Graham, (AC 18300),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In accordance with savings statutes, sentence was imposed under version of statute in effect at time of commission of crime which required mandatory 30 days imprisonment with no consideration of mitigating factors.
|
|||||
| State v. McClendon, (AC 18772),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Felony murder and robbery convictions were affirmed, because there was sufficient evidence to prove that defendant was an accomplice to the underlying robbery.
|
|||||
| Steinbach v. Steinbach, FA 990088848S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 1, 2000, Decided , February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Martin, FA 990629619,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, FAMILY SUPPORT MAGISTRATE DIVISION, February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Paternity case could continue despite putative father's death because statute provided legal basis for the action to continue. The State was directed to implead the executor or administrator of putative father's estate.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
