 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bennett v. Connecticut Hospice, Inc., (AC 18765),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, December 21, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claim that defendant infringed on plaintiff's constitutional right to the free exercise of religion was properly stricken since the choice made by plaintiff's daughter to have her remains cremated was of her own volition.
|
|||||
| Bowers v. Bowers, FA 870340254S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, December 21, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motions for contempt were granted against plaintiff regarding nonpayment of child support arrearages; motions for contempt were denied regarding real property distribution orders.
|
|||||
| Clark v. Warden, CV 960563145,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, December 21, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus failed to carry his burden to prove how his counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.
|
|||||
| Commissioner of Transp. v. Cambino, CV 980420696S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 21, 1999, Decided , December 21, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff 's motion in limine was granted where there was no basis for defendants' claim of "unity of use" of three properties, and defendants were aggrieved and entitled to two units' fair market value as of taking date.
|
|||||
| Dyck O'Neal, Inc. v. Wynne, (AC 18927),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, December 21, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to reopen deficiency judgment to reflect proper name of plaintiff properly granted. The name change did not affect the identity of plaintiff and defendant suffered no prejudice as a result of the error.
|
|||||
| Estate of Soares v. George A. Tomasso Const. Co., CV 980149527,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, December 21, 1999, Decided , December 21, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion to strike defendant's contributory negligence defense was denied because defendant alleged sufficient facts of extreme and particularized circumstances relating to decedent's duty as a passenger.
|
|||||
| In re Shyliesh H., (AC 19433),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, December 21, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute providing for termination of parental rights for failure to demonstrate sufficient personal rehabilitation as a parent held not unconstitutional on its face as void for vagueness.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Johnson, FA 980077616,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, December 21, 1999, Decided , December 21, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Disputed expert testimony on the fair market value of the marital property resulted in the court's weighing the testimony of both experts.
|
|||||
| Kaufmann v. Kaufmann, FA 980164992S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, December 21, 1999, Decided , December 21, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Divorce granted and orders entered respecting division of property, assignment of debts and obligations, providing for the care and custody of children, and allocating support and alimony.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
