|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 13, 2002
|
| |
B&H Drilling v. R.S. Assocs., CV010075883S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although filing of lis pendens was improper because title to or interest in owner's property was not at issue, counsel did not technically break rule or fail to follow statute or order; sanctions and fees were not imposed.
|
|
| |
Bankers Trust Co. v. Megos, 558890,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trust company that presented prima facie case for foreclosure was granted summary judgment as to mortgagor's liability, as mortgagor's assertion of partial payment under repayment plan did not constitute defense of payment or satisfaction.
|
|
| |
Bouffard v. Bouffard, FA010075740S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Evidence of the wife's inability to pay for counsel was sufficient reasonable cause to open the judgment which dissolved her 19-year marriage; wife showed reasonable cause, or that a good defense existed at the time of the judgment.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cantonbury Heights Condo. Ass'n v. Local Land Dev., CV010811180,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: For temporary injunction, plaintiff must show, inter alia, likelihood of prevailing on merits. As declarant was still obligated for certain items in connection with condominium, declarations provided that declarant had rights under declarations.
|
|
| |
Choquette v. Kaschel, CV000176073,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court denied defendant driver's estate's administrator's motion to strike plaintiff motorcyclist's and his wife's count alleging driver caused accident and driver's failure to stop to give assistance was negligence under statute and common law.
|
|
| |
Connelly v. Wendover Fin., CV020168999S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Plaintiffs' action was dismissed after original complaint contained incorrect return date, amended complaint was not properly served, and plaintiffs' final request to amend would have failed to produce return date within two months of service.
|
|
| |
Crutchfield v. Bennerman, CV970059960S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion to set aside nonsuit was timely filed after receipt of actual notice of judgment. Good cause of action existed at time judgment of nonsuit entered and reasonable cause prevented prosecuting of action.
|
|
| |
Cummins v. Cummins, FA0092298S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Marriage was dissolved and property was equitably dissolved. Wife received physical custody of children subject to husband's right to liberal visitation. Husband was to pay child support and alimony.
|
|
| |
Devita v. Sirico, CV010448826S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Claimant against decedent's estate, not being decedent's relative, did not have to overcome inference services to decedent were gratuitous, and amounts claimed for real estate management services and out-of-pocket expenses were reasonable.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback