 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aponte v. Baez, CV000802893,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under choice of law analysis, Connecticut law was applicable. Driver of vehicle was Connecticut resident, parties' relationship arose in Connecticut, and vehicle was rented in Connecticut.
|
|||||
| Beavers v. Thermer, CV010096038,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where statute of limitations had run prior to tortfeasor receiving service, injured party's claim was not time-barred. Papers for service were given to a marshal prior to expiration of statute of limitations.
|
|||||
| City of New Haven v. Absolute Surplus Disc., CV010447904,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Guarantor admitted all relevant allegations of complaint that payments were not made under promissory note or guaranty. City was not obligated to accept partial payments.
|
|||||
| Demarinis v. Bill Hamlin Constr. Co., CV000068874S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Complaint raised genuine issues of material fact with regard to whether contractor failed to exercise reasonable care in removing snow and ice from parking lot where injured party slipped and fell and was injured.
|
|||||
| Frank v. Frank, FA970347719S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court found it was in children's best interest to have opportunity for development of meaningful, unrestrained, and normal relationship with father, and it granted unsupervised visitation, but imposed conditions that protected children.
|
|||||
| Greathouse v. Greathouse, CV970159726S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied executor's motion to strike plaintiff's complaint because motion was filed after deceased had filed an answer and was untimely and because justice demanded that plaintiff be allowed to amend complaint to join necessary parties.
|
|||||
| Gutierrez v. Bland, 059841,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where car insurer settled claims against volunteer fireman arising out of collision that occurred during discharge of his duties, no judgment was rendered against volunteer fireman, and thus, town had no statutory duty of indemnification.
|
|||||
| In re Angel S., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, JUVENILE MATTERS AT HARTFORD, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parental rights of father with a criminal history, who never manifested a consistent and reasonable degree of interest, concern or responsibility as to the welfare of his handicapped and developmentally delayed sons, were terminated.
|
|||||
| In re Felicia B., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court terminated parental rights in eight-year-old daughter of consenting drug-involved mother and of objecting out-of-state incarcerated father in daughter's best interests after considering seven statutory factors in dispositional phase.
|
|||||
| Kelley v. McGrail, CV000599469S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Letter concerning loan's fraudulent basis triggered six-month statute of limitations. Lender's bald assertions that he did not receive letter did not overcome presumption of truth in return of service. Note was negotiable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
