 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| 70 Water St. Assocs. v. Norwalk Zoning Comm'n, CV010181984,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Local agency was not required to consider environmental impact of a prior owner's property use, or to order remediation of the effects of such prior use as a condition of approval of applicant's use of property. Grant of special permit was proper.
|
|||||
| Bartolomeo v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of New Haven, CV010450561S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A lessee's appeal of a cease and desist order was properly denied because a zoning board of appeals was justified in determining that the lessee was operating a dance hall without permission where 120 people were observed dancing on the premises.
|
|||||
| Charlesworth v. Sbc Communs., CV01076399S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 3, 2003, Decided , February 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A customer could not maintain actions for violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, wanton and reckless conduct, or breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing where a publisher merely made errors in a telephone listing.
|
|||||
| Cintas Corp. v. Quintiliani, CV020461749S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 3, 2003, Decided , February 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Corporation did not prove truck stop operator breached contract between parties, as evidence did not show parties changed their original agreement and did show corporation did not provide required services it promised under original agreement.
|
|||||
| Coleman v. Aspiwall, CV020464305,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 3, 2003, Decided , February 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Legal malpractice action was dismissed where client failed to establish attorney acted in wanton, reckless, or malicious manner, or client suffered prejudice or harm due to attorney's alleged pre-trial ineffective assistance of counsel.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Johnson, FA900376717,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 3, 2003, Decided , February 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A former husband was required to name his former wife the beneficiary of the amount of accrued alimony arrearage from his deferred compensation plan should he die before age 62 and if he lived to age 62, to pay the total amount due from the plan.
|
|||||
| Krondes v. O'Boy, CV930135694,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 3, 2003, Decided , February 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A transferor's discharge in bankruptcy did not serve to also discharge the liabilities of a third-party transferee in a fraudulent conveyance action. Creditor did not have to obtain pre-bankruptcy lien prior to pursuing a fraudulent transfer action.
|
|||||
| Neuhaus v. DeCholnoky, CV960153565,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 3, 2003, Decided , February 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no continuing duty or special relationship between an obstetrician and the infant that she delivered, nor was there a showing of fraudulent concealment that tolled the statute of limitations on a medical malpractice claim.
|
|||||
| Parker v. Ginsburg Dev., CV020188873,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 3, 2003, Decided , February 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer's motion to strike was granted where employee failed to allege sufficient facts to sustain claims for breach of contract, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, promissory estoppel, misrepresentation, and tortious interference.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
