 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ames v. Comm'r of Motor Vehicles, (SC 16831),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 3, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision denying a car owner punitive damages and attorney's fees under a statute requiring car dealers to post surety bonds was proper because the statute did not contain express language allowing recovery of such damages or fees.
|
|||||
| Carrubba v. Moskowitz, (AC 22962),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 3, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel appointed by Connecticut trial court to represent children in divorce was akin to guardian ad litem and therefore enjoyed qualified judicial immunity from malpractice action subsequently brought by father purportedly on son's behalf.
|
|||||
| Crone v. Connelly, (SC 16965),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 3, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ferris v. Faford, CV020068652S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, February 3, 2004, Decided , February 3, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The State proffered clear and convincing evidence that a later will was appropriately executed and that a copy was accurate. The presumption of revocation was rebutted. The evidence also indicated a nephew fraudulently submitted an earlier will.
|
|||||
| Jacobs v. Chester Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Comm'n, CV020097497S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 3, 2004, Decided , February 3, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While applicants' appeal could not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, they had to obtain a permit to conduct stream-bed management, as that activity was not recognized as an "as of right" activity that did not require a permit.
|
|||||
| McMahon v. Warden, CV020003826S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 3, 2004, Decided , February 3, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel. The inmate, who shot and killed a hiker while illegally hunting on private land, voluntarily waived his right to a jury trial.
|
|||||
| Miller v. Miller, CV030089718,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 3, 2004, Decided , February 3, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reviewing court dismissed mother's appeal of removal as daughter's conservator for buying house in her name and charging daughter rent in violation of probate court order; she did not have pecuniary interest standing or other standing to appeal.
|
|||||
| Nancys Tree Planting, Inc. v. Garden Res. Group, Inc., CV03082622,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Corporation's motion to dismiss was denied, as the trial court could not conclude that contract was formed or that a forum selection clause in a document in an unsigned customer information packet accompanying a credit application should be enforced.
|
|||||
| Paulin v. Paulin, FA030400451S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 3, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
