 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gazo v. City of Stamford, (SC 16202),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 30, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Bank's maintenance contractor owed a direct duty of care to injury victim who slipped on the sidewalk that the contractor was obligated to keep free of ice and snow as the injury was within the scope of foreseeability.
|
|||||
| Gillogly v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, (AC 19959),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 30, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where hearing officer said he would remove a statement from record, yet failed to do so, and in fact considered statement in his ruling, and plaintiff did not move for reconsideration, judgment was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Hooks v. Commissioner of Correction, (AC 19912),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 30, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in dismissing the habeas petition or in denying certification to appeal, as petitioner did not rebut the strong presumption that his counsel's conduct fell within the wide range of reasonableness.
|
|||||
| Hoye v. DeWolfe Co., (AC 20002),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 30, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff on breach of contract claim was affirmed where conclusion that severance agreement did not have to be signed by defendant to be legally enforceable was not clearly erroneous.
|
|||||
| In re Rayshawn P., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, JUVENILE MATTERS, January 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The minor child's biological mother's application for waiver of fees, costs, and security to appeal judgment terminating her parental rights was denied. Court determined that proposed appeal was entirely without merit.
|
|||||
| In re Wilfredo S., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, JUVENILE MATTERS, January 30, 2001, Decided , January 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondent father's parental rights were terminated and a permanency plan ordered where it was determined that respondent had abandoned his child.
|
|||||
| KBC Realty v. Wyzik, 6475,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, HOUSING SESSION AT HARTFORD, January 30, 2001, Decided , January 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because partnership could lease or rent the property to others, a partner who had voluntarily assumed the role of tenant was not insulated from the responsibilities of a tenant to the partnership.
|
|||||
| Kessler v. Securitylink, 071451S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant fire alarm company was not enjoined to inspect and repair the fire alarm systems of customers' homes other than plaintiff homeowners' home, as plaintiff insurer suffered no ascertainable loss as to the other homes.
|
|||||
| Lux v. Environmental Warranty, CV960560991,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 30, 2001, Decided , January 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former employee was not entitled to payment for three accrued vacation days from his former employer because the court was more than satisfied that he more than used up any accrued vacation time in his personal pursuits.
|
|||||
| Peppermill Village Condo. Ass'n v. Starosciak, CV00093499,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 30, 2001, Decided , January 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to dismiss foreclosure action was denied. The court had jurisdiction to hear foreclosure cases.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
