|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 13, 2002
|
| |
|
| |
Ertel v. Graham, CV000093046S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Tenant owed unpaid rent and utilities to landlord and breached her duty under lease to remove property, trash, and rubbish from premises, and failed to leave premises in good, clean condition upon vacating at end of tenancy.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Ge Capital Mortg. Servs. v. Bartlett, CV010164341S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Mortgagee was not entitled to summary judgment on owner's liability on promissory note, where mortgagee failed to provide clear evidence owner was liable or that she received notice of alleged default.
|
|
| |
Gutierrez v. Bland, 059841,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Town's liability to joint tortfeasor under municipal indemnification statutes was contingent upon a judgment against the municipal employee. Where claim was settled without entry of judgment, indemnification claim against town was denied.
|
|
| |
Kelo v. City of New London, 557299,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court granted permanent injunction in parcel 4A, for lack of necessity, and temporary injunction in parcel 3 against home condemnation under city's municipal development plan developed under state statutes by state agency designated by city.
|
|
| |
Kimball v. King, 066390,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion to strike special defense was denied where it was proper for builder to plead mitigation of damages as defense to home owners' breach of contract claim. However, prayer for relief based upon affirmative defense was procedurally improper.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Nardella v. Vachon, CV97542668,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 13, 2002, Decided , March 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback