 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kerzner v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., CV980488926S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In claim for UIM benefits arising from traffic accident, as injured person had put his psychological condition at issue by his claim of pain and suffering, interests of justice required that records be disclosed and protective order was denied.
|
|||||
| Linda G. v. Todd G., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court's judgment denied father's motion to relocate with son to Ohio from Connecticut, as court was concerned that father did not look into similar Connecticut opportunities and that mother and her family would have less visitation.
|
|||||
| Lugo v. Nat'l Cas. Ins., CV010453624S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court overruled cab insurer's objections to injured passenger's non-standard interrogatories to it with no court approval. Action was not based on operation or ownership of motor vehicle but concerned uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage.
|
|||||
| Michael J. Fitzgerald Contr. Co. v. People's Bank, CV970162318,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where bank permitted an unauthorized transfer of funds, but bank had previously warned company owner to close account to which he and suspected embezzler were signatories, company's negligence in failing to do so outweighed bank's negligence.
|
|||||
| Moyher v. Moyher, FA000072116S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dissolution was granted wherein husband would pay child support and provide medical and life insurance for child's benefit. Marital assets were equitably divided.
|
|||||
| Rich v. Stop & Shop Cos., CV990067075S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Customer failed to establish by fair preponderance of evidence regarding defect in store that caused his fall.
|
|||||
| State v. Deloreto, CR000190119S, CR000189970S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's words were "fighting words" and not entitled to First Amendment protection. He threatened violence against police officers and used threatening gestures.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Metro. Prop., CV980162848S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 30, 2002, Decided , January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court granted summary judgment dismissing son's and son's wife's uninsured motorist claim against mother's policy's insurer since mother's policy had been canceled prior to accident date and insurer had refunded unearned premiums.
|
|||||
| United Stone Am. v. Frazier, X03CV010508999S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Agent could have been liable for interference with contract of its principal if agent acted in bad faith or beyond its authority. Negligence count was stricken, as agent could not have owed duty without breaching its agency agreement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
