LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - February 1, 2005

  
In re Doe, F04CPO3006013A, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, February 1, 2005, Decided , February 1, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because a petition to terminate parental rights alleged abandonment and failure to rehabilitate but did not allege child abuse, the exception in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-146o(b)(4) that exempted "abuse" from confidentiality protection did not serve as grounds to grant petitioner access to parents' mental health records.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Nashiah C., (AC 25098), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Neither the vacation of a prior custody order nor an untimely hearing precluded jurisdiction to sustain a temporary order for custody of a child, and evidence of the mother's substance abuse and domestic violence warranted the custody order.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jefferson v. McCarthy, CV010809740S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 1, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Keevan v. Keevan, FA020193039S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 1, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A father was entitled to an adjustment in his child support arrearage where it was shown that a payment was not attributed to him and he was entitled to a credit in a specific amount. The mother's contributions from her domestic partner were properly excluded from her gross income when child support was calculated.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lacks v. Comm'r of Corr., (AC 24533), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Where the court found on direct appeal that the prosecutor's improper comments did not prejudice petitioner, habeas relief for counsel's failure to object was denied; the differences in trials justified new trial for co-defendant and not petitioner.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Miranda v. Bowie, 124667, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, February 1, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a partition action, judgment was entered for plaintiff for the full net proceeds of the sale of the property because all the oral testimony supported the contention that the amount defendant put into the property was a loan to plaintiff and her husband, which they repaid in full within six months.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Morgan v. Comm'r of Corr., (AC 24270), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Counsel rights in the United States and Connecticut Constitutions were extended to habeas corpus proceedings. Remand of the case was ordered because trial court failed to inquire as to whether grievances filed against attorney constituted a conflict.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Parente v. Pirozzoli, (AC 24916), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: When a felon sued his partner for violating partnership agreement to run bar, agreement was unenforceable despite partner's failure to plead its illegality as felon introduced evidence of his conviction and court could decide illegality in any event.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Pentecostal Church of God I.M. v. Pentecostal Church of God Int'l Movement, 457417, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 1, 2005, Decided , February 1, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court denied summary judgment to church in its suit alleging that religious movement wrongfully ousted church's pastor because whether there was genuine issue of material fact as to whether pastor was involuntarily ousted was factual issue that would bear on equitable relief, if any, ultimately ordered on church's prayer for permanent injunction.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Quasius v. Quasius, (AC 23882), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 1, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: It was not abuse of discretion to conclude that husband's unsuccessful stock market trades did not violate automatic stay in marriage dissolution action where it was reasonable to conclude that trades fell within usual course of business exception.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.