 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rovasio v. Wells Fargo Armored Servs. Corp., File No. CV980062143S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 30, 2001, Memorandum Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied employer's summary judgment motion. Employee had received workers' compensation, but it was reasonably certain that employee would be injured since employer did not provide a bulletproof vest.
|
|||||
| Salvey Office Sys. v. Administrator, CV96337332S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claimant's eligibility for unemployment benefits was affirmed because the board's finding, that claimant had not voluntarily terminated his employment, was rationally supported by the record.
|
|||||
| Simso v. Salinas, CV970573175,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 30, 2001, Decided , January 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In mandamus petition, fact that plaintiff suffered monetary loss that was specific to him did not defeat action because plaintiff sought writ to have commissioner carry out law and protect him and other consumers.
|
|||||
| State v. Cecarelli, CR90132946, CR90132947, CR90132948, CR90132949,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 30, 2001, Decided , January 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court did not dismiss the case against defendant for a seven year delay to conduct a post-conviction hearing. Speedy trial statute and law did not require dismissal of information when defendant's conviction was not yet reversed.
|
|||||
| State v. Clark, (SC 16258),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 30, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of motion to suppress cocaine found in defendant's sock affirmed where the arresting officer had sufficient reason to believe that the defendant was involved in drug trafficking and may have been armed and dangerous.
|
|||||
| State v. Corbin, (AC 20436),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 30, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions were affirmed where evidence was sufficient, non-custodial confession was voluntary, and jury instructions were proper; one sexual assault count was reversed where prior statement was improperly admitted as substantive evidence.
|
|||||
| State v. Guitard, (AC 19285),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 30, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly denied defendant's motion for standby counsel in his trial for assault and risk of injury to a child, because when defendant waived his right to counsel, his constitutional right to counsel ceased.
|
|||||
| State v. Hawthorne, (AC 19648),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 30, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of both assault and attempted murder for single attack on one victim, where actions taken during attack were able to be bifurcated into those that were reckless conduct and those done with intent to cause death.
|
|||||
| State v. Labbe, (AC 19410),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 30, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut defendant's subsequent uncharged conduct, nearly identical to indecent exposure incident on which he was tried, was admissible to show intent and course of conduct, just as prior conduct would have been.
|
|||||
| State v. Shannon, (AC 18741),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 30, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probation revocation was affirmed where State adduced sufficient evidence to establish defendant's involvement in sale of narcotics and this offense sufficed to establish violation of terms of defendant's probation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
