 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Andersen Consulting v. Gavin, CV 980492505S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, TAX SESSION, February 3, 2000, Decided , February 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court concluded that the true object of appellant's contract with certain corporations was for the provision of computer software programs, such that sales and use taxes did not apply.
|
|||||
| Baskin v. Transportation, CV 950377239S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court found that a taxi cab owner was self-insured and was responsible to compensate a passenger for any injuries proximately caused by the negligence of a hit and run vehicle.
|
|||||
| Chaffin v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., CV 97042323S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 3, 2000, Decided , February 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer's motion for summary judgment was denied, because the dispute over whether the damaged property was used at any time or in any manner for any business purpose, thus limiting liability, was a fact-specific inquiry.
|
|||||
| Fuhr v. Geico, CV 980167162,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 3, 2000, Decided , February 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because plaintiff sufficiently alleged a claim for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, by alleging more than defendant's mere refusal to pay under the insurance policy, defendant's motion to strike was denied.
|
|||||
| In re Alpha J., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 3, 2000, Decided , February 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was in best interest of child, domestic violence victim, to remain in care and custody of parents, with appropriate conditions, under supervision of agency but with minimal direct contact between agency and parents.
|
|||||
| Jones v. National Amusements, CV 970399415S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 3, 2000, Decided , February 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a slip and fall action, the evidence was sufficient to find that defendant movie theater had constructive notice of the icy walkway and was charged with the duty of remedying the defect or warning the plaintiff.
|
|||||
| Melzmuf v. City of Middletown, CV 9970522S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 3, 2000, Decided , February 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City and city officials' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' claims, which arose out of a car accident, was denied because plaintiffs had alleged a sufficient cause of action under a statute other than the Highway Defect Statute.
|
|||||
| Michaud v. Connecticut DOT, CV 980075711S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 3, 2000, Decided , February 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State transportation agency's truck was being used as warning signal and was not being operated at time of collision with decedent's vehicle; thus, summary judgment was granted in favor of agency in wrongful death action.
|
|||||
| Nettleton Mech. Contrs. v. City of Meriden, CV 0146838,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A quantum meruit claim was barred where the services performed were beyond the scope of the express contract, and a party to a contract could not be sued for intentional interference with that contract.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
