 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bell v. West Haven Bd. of Educ., CV970399597,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where issue of material fact existed as to whether atmosphere of chaos, disruptiveness, and violence existed at elementary school, school board and individual were not entitled to summary judgment on students' emotional distress claims.
|
|||||
| Circle "a" Auto. Serv. v. American Rentals, CV990433344S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff was not entitled to collect on unpaid invoices where continuous course of business for repair work on trucks did not include written authorization; rather, defendant gave plaintiff oral permission to make repairs.
|
|||||
| City of West Haven v. Norback, CV970417652,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In seeking a review of the value of property seized by the city in a condemnation proceeding, the court was required to assess not only the location and size of the property, but also possible uses for the property.
|
|||||
| Cruz v. Lage, CV990152002S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT WATERBURY, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Supervisor was not negligent in his driving, but plaintiff proved that bus driver negligently made a turn which resulted in an accident; thus, bus driver and his employer were responsible for plaintiff's damages.
|
|||||
| Doe v. New Haven Bd. of Educ., CV000443427S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiff did not designate an agent for service, but rather gave complaint to deputy sheriff who served it on improper agent of board of education, accidental failure of suit statute permitted plaintiff to refile lawsuit.
|
|||||
| Dower v. Dower, 0554832S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Dower v. Dower, 0554832S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court ordered that the wife was in contempt of automatic court divorce orders when she disposed of husband's clothes and removed family personal property to her new home, and ordered her to inventory and allow photos for future hearing.
|
|||||
| Fagan v. Adakonis, FA000338696S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parties' marriage was dissolved. Their property was distributed according to court's findings that their assets remained separate during marriage and that marriage had no impact on earnings or earning capacity of either party.
|
|||||
| Grant v. Brouard, CV970142033S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Contractor was not liable to home owner for faulty construction because owner had hired contractor knowing that he was not licensed architect or engineer to save money. Contractor got paid what he was worth and attempted to mislead court.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
