|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 14, 2002
|
| |
Celso v. Warden, CV00804106,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 14, 2002, Decided , March 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Champagne v. Champagne, FA980164250S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD -NORWALK, REGIONAL FAMILY TRIAL DOCKET, March 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In dissolution of marriage case, court entered orders regarding, inter alia, support, division of property, life insurance, and allocation of dependent child exemptions.
|
|
| |
Covino v. Guillory, CV980163041S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 14, 2002, Decided , March 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although builder breached construction contract, owner did not prove fiduciary relationship with principal sufficient to pierce corporate veil. However, principal individually participated in builder's wrongful acts.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Jones v. Warden, CV010809597,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 14, 2002, Decided , March 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Mann-Byrdsong v. Town of Bloomfield, CV990586162,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court granted motion to strike, based upon governmental immunity, student's negligent supervision suit against town and its school board, for assault by another student. There was no claim against employee for municipality derivative liability.
|
|
| |
Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys. v. Thompson, CV000595718,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 14, 2002, Decided , March 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Pruitt v. Main & Tower, CV960561045,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 14, 2002, Decided , March 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Test for respondeat superior rested on whether employee was furthering employer's business. Attack by bar's bouncer, to vent his own malevolence, was departure from his employment, and his employer was not responsible therefor.
|
|
| |
Santese v. Santese, FA9600727935,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 14, 2002, Decided , March 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Alimony was terminated where wife had begun cohabiting with male, and this arrangement had resulted in change of circumstances that favorably altered wife's financial needs.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback