 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brackett v. St. Mary's Hosp., X01CV970140111S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 31, 2002, Decided , January 31, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Two subpoenaed hospitals' personnel and credentials files were not privileged under a medical peer review statute; the suit in question did not arise out of the matters subject to evaluation and review of the credentials committees.
|
|||||
| Conn. Carpenters Benefit Funds v. Burkhard Hotel, 122084,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 31, 2002, Decided , January 31, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mere granting of permission for work to be conducted on one's property was not sufficient to support mechanic's lien. Landowner did not subject his property to a mechanic's lien by simply allowing work to be done on it.
|
|||||
| Cromwell Square v. Nunes, CV912285D,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, HOUSING SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, January 31, 2002, Decided , January 31, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Tenant did not exercise option to renew lease and landlord did not waive time limit for renewal. Since essential terms were not in agreement, there was no meeting of the minds to renew lease.
|
|||||
| Jenkins v. Kos, CV9988449,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 31, 2002, Decided , January 31, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probative value of evidence relating to prior lawsuit outweighed any prejudice. Counsel failed to ask court to act contemporaneously in response to sleeping juror. Motion to set aside jury verdict was denied.
|
|||||
| LLP Mortg. v. F&R, LLC, 558476,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Borrower did not show unassignability of mortgage or prejudice. It did not show misleading conduct, inducement or concealment of information, or that it acted or changed its position in reliance on lender's actions.
|
|||||
| Lowenstein v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals Branford, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 31, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court dismissed abutting landowners' appeal of zoning board's approval of narrow street setback requirement variance to legal nonconforming use landowners under hardship so they could build addition to their home.
|
|||||
| Magowan v. Magowan, FA980078479S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 31, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property distributions were not modifiable even if there was change in circumstances. If judgment conformed to stipulation it could not be altered or set aside unless it was shown that stipulation was obtained by fraud, accident, or mistake.
|
|||||
| Samuel Lotstein Realty v. Bed, CV000176618S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 31, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Instrumentality rule merely required court to find that defendants committed unjust act in violation of plaintiff's legal rights to pierce corporate veil. Genuine issue of fact remained and summary judgment was denied.
|
|||||
| Steponaitis v. Stoughton, CV000082383S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 31, 2002, Decided , January 31, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Purchaser was liable for damages for conversion of stone, even though demand was not made prior to bringing of lawsuit, where purchaser was informed of defect in ownership of stone the day he took possession, but made no effort to return stone.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
