 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lorenzo M., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, December 22, 1999, Decided , December 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother's parental rights were terminated; she subjected her neglected son to acts of commission and omission, which caused him serious injury, and mother failed to rehabilitate herself despite opportunities provided to her.
|
|||||
| O'Donal v. Tetreault, 547902,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, December 22, 1999, Decided , December 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendants in quiet title action who claimed adverse possession could only prove occasional use of a shared area, they failed to meet their burden to prove adverse possession by clear and convincing evidence.
|
|||||
| Phoebe G. v. Solnit, (SC 16037),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, December 22, 1999, Officially Released **** December 22, 1999, the date that this opinion was released as a slip opinion, is the operative date for all substantive and procedural purposes.
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff who suffered from mental illness could make claims under patients' bill of rights and had right to patient advocate but could not bring action through next friend unless exceptional circumstances existed.
|
|||||
| Pikul v. Bitar, CV 980487825S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, December 22, 1999, Decided , December 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court had proper jurisdiction where a plaintiff's complaint sufficiently alleged violations of plaintiff's rights under the Patients' Bill of Rights.
|
|||||
| Quarry Knoll II Corp. v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n of Greenwich, CV 980492253S, CV 990492947S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, December 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The denial of a building permit was erroneous because the planning and zoning commission failed to satisfy its burden of determining that the reasons for not allowing the permit clearly outweighed the need for affordable housing.
|
|||||
| Shapiro v. Shapiro, FA 980718335S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, December 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the court made an arithmetical error in calculating assets owned by the parties, the court granted defendant's motion to reargue and clarify, and corrected the earlier erroneous judgment.
|
|||||
| State v. Ham, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, December 22, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Ledbetter, CR 96485120T,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, December 22, 1999, Decided , December 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile offender's posture that she voluntarily signed her waiver and statement because she relied upon her father's misplaced advice about the consequences she faced was not a sufficient bar to admission of her confession.
|
|||||
| State v. McColl, CR 278765,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, December 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where evidence indicated defendant consented to police's entry into his home, voluntarily signed Miranda waiver, and evidence indicated his statement was voluntary, motion to suppress confession was denied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
