 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Debra S., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, JUVENILE MATTERS, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondent parents' parental rights were terminated based on abandonment and their failure to rehabilitate successfully so that reunification could occur. Children had been in foster care for two years.
|
|||||
| In re Linda Q., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, JUVENILE MATTERS, AT WATERBURY,, January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner met its burden of proving the operative allegations of its neglect petition by showing that respondents' two minor children were exposed to drug paraphernalia and unsanitary living conditions.
|
|||||
| In re Manuel N., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, JUVENILE MATTERS, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parents' rights over their minor child were terminated where they failed to maintain a reasonable degree of interest in the welfare of their child, and there was no ongoing parent-child relationship between them.
|
|||||
| Lynch v. Lynch, FA000436412S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dissolution of marriage of parties on grounds of irretrievable breakdown was proper where the marriage was irretrievably broken down without prospect for reconciliation and defendant's actions were a cause of the breakdown of the marriage.
|
|||||
| Palozej v. Ellington Ridge Country Club, X07CV950058418S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Whether plaintiff signed a release from her complaint for emotional distress under duress were questions for the trier of fact. Thus, she established a question of material fact. Court denied defendants' summary judgment motion.
|
|||||
| Reider v. Andersen, File No. CV980151625S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 31, 2001, Memorandum Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because state insurance commissioner had the duty to take over and manage the affairs of an insurance company for the public, the company itself had an enforceable claim against any person or entity who unlawfully contributed to its insolvency.
|
|||||
| State v. Strickland, PJRCV000803071,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The prejudgment remedy for recovery of costs of defendant's incarceration and the return of public assistance rendered to the victim, as requested, was granted as the State would probably prevail on its proposed complaint.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Wesson, Inc., CV990152606S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment motion in negligence action was denied where lessees had duty to exercise reasonable care to protect plaintiff from dangers that might reasonably have been anticipated and whether duty was breached was question of fact.
|
|||||
| Traggis v. Shawmut Bank State, 374302,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 31, 2001, Decided , January 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court reformed real estate contract where seller made a typographical error in drafting the contract. Buyer knew of the mistake but acted inequitably by trying to benefit from it, even though he knew that it was, in fact, a mistake.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
