 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| McCavanaugh v. Cleary, CV020079782S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 4, 2003, Decided , February 4, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants were enjoined from widening a right-of-way beyond 12 feet; the right-of-way had previously been limited to 12 feet, and the terms of a deed which established the right-of-way depended on the size of the right-of-way as it existed.
|
|||||
| Nofs v. Gemini Network, CV020818599S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 4, 2003, Decided , February 4, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court granted prejudgment remedy to an employee in an action against his former employer for wrongful discharge and breach of contract, but denied the remedy as to a statutory claim for wages.
|
|||||
| O'Bryan v. O'Bryan, (SC 16666),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 4, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court improperly modified the father's obligation to pay postmajority child support since the parties did not have a written agreement that provided that the trial court could do so.
|
|||||
| State v. Austin, (AC 21815),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 4, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Officers had probable cause to arrest and search a suspect based on other officers' observations; a witness sequestration order for the suppression hearing extended through trial, but its violation was not reversible error.
|
|||||
| State v. Crosby, CR97185038, CR97185630,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 7 AT MERIDEN, February 4, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since convicted criminal was sentenced to two probations on his underlying offenses and violated those probationary sentences by using narcotics, the sentencing court did not err in the sentence it imposed following revocation of his probation.
|
|||||
| State v. Otero, CR96488637,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 4, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant, while on probation, participated in killing victim whom defendant and others mistook for a rival gang member, 20-year sentence for accessory to manslaughter 1st with firearm and conspiracy to commit assault 1st was not inappropriate.
|
|||||
| State v. Ritrovato, CR00080383,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 21 AT NORWICH, February 4, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court found no compelling reason or change in circumstances to modify the bail conditions that it set at the time of conviction for purposes of defendant's pending appeal for sexual assault and risk of injury to a minor, among other things.
|
|||||
| State v. Santiago, (AC 22303),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 4, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for assault and risk of injury to child was upheld where jury reasonably found injuries occurred when defendant dropped infant on head and then shook him; State was only required to show general intent to perform act resulting in injury.
|
|||||
| State v. Sawyer, (AC 22382),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 4, 2003, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a prosecution for sexual assault, evidence that defendant had threatened victim's sister after she refused to have sex with him, and that defendant had used a knife to puncture a tire on a vehicle owned by victim's brother was properly admitted.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
