|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 2, 2007
|
| |
Stahl v. Webster Bank Nat'l Ass'n, CV044005592S, Opinion No.: 97063,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A bank's special defenses were stricken in an action by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) alleging violations of the Transfer Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 22a-134 et seq., because since the bank sold the property after acquiring it by foreclosure, it was required to file the appropriate forms.
|
|
| |
TelAid Indus. v. Tricomm Group, Inc., 064006190,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 2, 2007, Decided , February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the court found that the brief and conclusory doctor's certificate was not sufficient to obtain a blanket protective order barring his deposition pursuant to Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. ? 13-5, the court ordered a temporary protective order, but the new employer was to make his physician available to the court for examination.
|
|
| |
Valley Hous., LP v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV054003843S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT DERBY, February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: As there was no express provision in the Derby, Conn., Zoning Regulations that required an owner of nonconforming structures to obtain variances for renovations in order to continue their permitted use as multi-family residences, the city zoning board of appeals erred in upholding the denial of certificates of zoning compliance.
|
|
| |
Wagner v. Feldstein, CV06054003866S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because a counterclaim sounded in vexatious litigation, and because the defendant did not alleged that the litigation claimed to be vexatious terminated in some way favorable to him, the pleading was legally insufficient; therefore, the plaintiff's motion to strike was granted.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback