 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Anthony v. Candy, CV 9866299S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, December 23, 1999, Decided , December 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Painter recovered balance due on contract, because his work was workmanlike and satisfactory, and painting a new home was an integral part of its construction; thus, he did not have to register as a home improvement contractor.
|
|||||
| Bordiere v. Ramirez, SPN991031769NB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, December 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Landlord was not allowed to evict tenants for nonpayment of rent when premises were untenantable during month in which rent was owed due to housing code violations; retaliatory eviction defense was not available when rent had not been paid.
|
|||||
| Doyle v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., (SC 15939),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, December 23, 1999, Officially Released ** December 23, 1999, the date that this opinion was released as a slip opinion, is the operative date for all substantive and procedural purposes.
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's underinsured motorist coverage was not triggered where tortfeasor was not underinsured motorist because plaintiff was limited to recovering same amount under either his policy or the tortfeasor's policy.
|
|||||
| Felicello v. Cerillo, CV 990421617S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 23, 1999, Decided , December 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Vehicle repair shop's artificer's lien was discharged because under Connecticut law, a vehicle repair shop could not charge for repairs in the absence of a written authorization.
|
|||||
| Higley v. Town of Somers, CV 9868429S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, December 23, 1999, Decided , December 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision of zoning board was affirmed because prior failure of defendant to enforce regulations did not preclude cease and desist order. Board could reasonably find use of plaintiffs' property amounted to contractor's yard.
|
|||||
| Homeside Lending v. Torres, CV 980420452,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 23, 1999, Decided , December 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Special defenses asserted by defendants were legally insufficient, as they failed to address the making, validity or enforcement of the mortgage and/or note; however, claim of insufficient knowledge amounted to denial.
|
|||||
| Jabs v. Nationwide Ins., CV 990153459,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, December 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the limits of the uninsured provision of the insured's policy was the same as his liability limits, and the insured did not request lesser amounts, the uninsured carrier had no duty to advise the insured to purchase more uninsured coverage.
|
|||||
| Miles v. Savona, CV 970483383S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, December 23, 1999, Decided , December 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Except with regard to sellers' refusal to permit access to retest well water, judgment was entered for sellers on all other allegations, because defects were within buyers' ability to discover by asking questions or testing.
|
|||||
| New Haven Plaza Assocs. v. City of New Haven, CV 990421617S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 23, 1999, Decided , December 23, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff that failed to respond to or appeal from cease and desist order in any formal legal manner, presented no prima facie claim for which relief could be granted.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
