|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 5, 2004
|
| |
Anderson v. Adm'r, Unemployment Comp. Act, CV030404773S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Bailey v. Allegretti, CV030082459S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Cayer Enters. v. DiMassi, CV030348009S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's motion for summary judgment was granted because plaintiffs had the opportunity to litigate the issues presented in the current action in a previous action.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Conn. Elec. Equip. Co. v. Beedle, CV030284976S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a non-appearing guarantor gave no notice asserting denials, defenses, counterclaims, or set-offs, court was not allowed to consider if language of "guarantee" was sufficient to establish personal guarantee, and damages award was entered.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Gravel v. Swanson, 378171,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Harrison v. McPherson, CV010278005S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 7 AT MERIDEN, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although injured party merely incorporated negligence count into recklessness count, latter was sufficient to defeat motion to strike, where host allegedly served minor driver alcohol while driver was drunk and allowed driver to get behind wheel.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Michalik v. Rutkowski, CV010804224S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback