LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - February 5, 2004

  
Anderson v. Adm'r, Unemployment Comp. Act, CV030404773S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bailey v. Allegretti, CV030082459S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cayer Enters. v. DiMassi, CV030348009S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's motion for summary judgment was granted because plaintiffs had the opportunity to litigate the issues presented in the current action in a previous action.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cherry Hill Constr. Co. v. Gateway Plaza, CV030081364, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 5, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A contractor's motion to substitute was granted, as the name given in its complaint was a misnomer and did not defeat standing, as the substituted name was very close to the erroneous name.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Conn. Elec. Equip. Co. v. Beedle, CV030284976S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a non-appearing guarantor gave no notice asserting denials, defenses, counterclaims, or set-offs, court was not allowed to consider if language of "guarantee" was sufficient to establish personal guarantee, and damages award was entered.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cormier v. Pham, CV030177746S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendants' apportionment complaint against a city was dismissed; the city was immune from the action, as defendants failed to provide the 90-day notice required by the relevant statute, and statutes relied on by defendants did not apply.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gravel v. Swanson, 378171, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Harrison v. McPherson, CV010278005S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 7 AT MERIDEN, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Although injured party merely incorporated negligence count into recklessness count, latter was sufficient to defeat motion to strike, where host allegedly served minor driver alcohol while driver was drunk and allowed driver to get behind wheel.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hull v. Nicholas, CV030194538S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where attorneys alleged that broker misrepresented that a client's fees would be paid by sale of property, broker and real estate company were not entitled to have attorneys' claims alleging conspiracy to defraud and unfair trade practices stricken.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Michalik v. Rutkowski, CV010804224S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 5, 2004, Decided , February 5, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.