|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 1, 2001
|
| |
|
| |
Siebold v. Staye, CV000083047S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 1, 2001, Decided , February 1, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In damages action, summary judgment was granted in favor of defendants where plaintiffs' action was barred by two-year statute of limitations. By time plaintiffs brought action against defendants, over four years had passed since incident.
|
|
| |
Vanase v. State, CV000554764S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 1, 2001, Decided , February 1, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The court granted defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's claim for bystander emotional distress in relation to a medical malpractice claim; plaintiff failed to allege a significant event or conduct leading to immediate emotional distress.
|
|
| |
Worldwide Preservation Servs. v. Ivth Shea, X05CV980167154S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 1, 2001, Decided , February 1, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Plaintiff's remedies against contractor were in contract. Claims for unfair and deceptive trade practices, aiding and abetting, and civil conspiracy were dismissed; economic loss doctrine was applied.
|
|
| |
Worldwide Preservation Servs. v. Ivth Shea, X05CV980167154S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 1, 2001, Decided , February 1, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Unfair and deceptive trade practices statute did not apply because claims essentially alleged professional engineering malpractice, and applicability of statute was thus limited to claims for entrepreneurial or commercial misconduct.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|