|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 5, 2003
|
| |
Quint v. Bridgeport Cc Warden, CV020399251,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 5, 2003, Decided , February 5, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A prisoner's habeas corpus petition alleging that a correctional facility had refused him adequate medical treatment was dismissed; the prisoner failed to show that the facility demonstrated deliberate indifference to his medical needs.
|
|
| |
Rivera v. Warden, CV972448,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 5, 2003, Decided , February 5, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Due process was not violated when petitioner's statutory good time credits were taken. Because the granting of such credits was discretionary, petitioner could not have a liberty interest in the credits.
|
|
| |
Robyn v. Palmer-Smith, CV990174453,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 5, 2003, Decided , February 5, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The mother was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, as the victim did not prove that the son had any dangerous tendencies of which the mother should have been aware. Thus, she did not have a duty to exercise reasonable care to control the child.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Statewide Griev. Comm. v. Guttman, CV020821372,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 5, 2003, Decided , February 5, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney's failure to return balance of retainer to client despite acknowledging the existence of that balance a few years earlier violated four Connecticut Rules of Professional Conduct and warranted a six-month suspension from law practice.
|
|
| |
White v. White, FA990269883S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 5, 2003, Decided , February 5, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A former husband's weekly alimony obligation was reduced by $ 250 where a substantial change in his financial circumstances was found based on the husband's change in job status and reduction in weekly pay in the amount of approximately $ 400.
|
|
| |
Winer v. Stratford Zoning Comm'n, CV990365500S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 5, 2003, Decided , February 5, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A use variance was properly denied where a property owner failed to show a hardship that was an unusual characteristic which deprived her of the reasonable use of her property, and where the prior owner's request for the use variance was denied.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback