 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cabanillas v. Vendetti, CV980487397S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 2, 2001, Decided , February 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion for permission to file summary judgment was denied where it was the wrong method for challenging a prayer for relief.
|
|||||
| Contois v. Carmen Anthony Restaurant Group, CV000160287,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 2, 2001, Decided , February 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In wrongful discharge action, motion to strike negligent infliction of emotional distress claim was granted where allegations regarding termination and refusal to pay medical expenses were insufficient to support the claim.
|
|||||
| Denino v. Wethersfield Country Club, CV00801570S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Country club member's request for injunction seeking to restrain country club from enforcing suspension of membership privileges was denied. Likelihood that member would prevail on claim of illegal and unfair hearing was minimal.
|
|||||
| Guarco v. Scalise, CV950573527,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 2, 2001, Decided , February 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff was entitled to adverse possession of a fenced area, the axel, and the abutting sandpit, and also to a prescriptive easement over the remaining portion of the disputed area.
|
|||||
| Hallmark Woodworkers v. Valentine, CV010341212S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 2, 2001, Decided , February 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted plaintiff's motion for a prejudgment remedy, as the court found that there was probable cause that plaintiff would prevail against defendant, based on a contract between the parties for the services performed by plaintiff.
|
|||||
| LeClair v. BankBoston, N.A., CV990497186S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 2, 2001, Decided , February 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Apportionment defendant's motion to strike defendant bank's apportionment complaint was denied where the motion relied on facts that were not pled in the apportionment complaint.
|
|||||
| McClelland v. Day Kimball Hosp., X07CV980071389S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT ROCKVILLE, February 2, 2001, Decided , February 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was denied in malpractice suit as the issue of the hospital's apparent authority for its radiologists was one of fact, requiring an evaluation of the parties' conduct in light of all of the surrounding circumstances.
|
|||||
| Ploen v. Ploen, 0117007S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, February 2, 2001, Decided , February 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for dissolution of a marriage was granted due to irretrievable breakdown, custody of the parties' minor child was awarded to the wife, and child support and alimony were awarded to the wife.
|
|||||
| State v. Reese, CR99151739T,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 2, 2001, Decided , February 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
