|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 18, 2002
|
| |
Aresco v. Aresco, FA010276475S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, March 18, 2002, Decided , March 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court divided marital assets and liabilities, ordered husband to provide wife medical insurance, transfer IRA to her IRA, pay temporary alimony, pay part of her attorney's fees, and restrained each of them from entering other's property.
|
|
| |
Balogh v. City of Shelton, CV990067521S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, March 18, 2002, Decided , March 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Collateral estoppel did not bar state action for wrongful arrest, where federal court's grant of summary judgment on civil rights claim did not find existence of actual probable cause and was not necessary for its finding of qualified immunity.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Digan v. City of Middletown, CV010093999,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 18, 2002, Decided , March 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Police manual was not contract between parties and lacked common council approval as a contract. Since city failed to mention or analyze employee's estoppel claim(s), summary judgment was unwarranted.
|
|
| |
Mjm Landscaping v. Lorant, CV990174738S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 18, 2002, Decided , March 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Subcontractor proved allegations in its complaint and was not subject to home improvement act. Owner failed to prove his special defenses.
|
|
| |
Palmieri v. City of New Haven, X01CV980166015,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, March 18, 2002, Decided , March 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: All of property owner's claims subject to unexhausted statutory remedies were dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Negligence claim was not subject to statutory remedies and was not dismissed.
|
|
| |
Zayas v. State, CV960332554S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 18, 2002, Decided , March 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: As petitioner's federal conviction did not occur until his state sentence had been served, he was not being deprived of any liberty interest for reason of state conviction and there was no subject matter jurisdiction to grant requested relief.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback