 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Claud-Chambers v. City of W. Haven, CV990430562S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 4, 2002, Decided , February 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was nothing to support claims that taking of properties was not justified or that property owners were not justly compensated. There was no inverse condemnation claim where properties were taken by eminent domain.
|
|||||
| Dow & Condon v. Brookfield Dev. Corp., CV000596719S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 4, 2002, Decided , February 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The co-broker was not only prohibited from sharing any commission with the broker, but it was also prohibited from obtaining a commission where the broker was not licensed in Connecticut and the contract was with the broker.
|
|||||
| Doyle v. Kaar Constr., CV990497202S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 4, 2002, Decided , February 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to contract, construction company had a duty to employees to insure that safe scaffolding was provided for their work and had an obligation to make sure that the subcontractors were inspecting the scaffolding daily.
|
|||||
| Lawson v. Lawson, FA010094927,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 4, 2002, Decided , February 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court granted dissolution of her marriage and primary physical custody of two minor children, home, her retirement plan, certain stocks, no alimony, and $ 125 weekly child support (to continue to Down's Syndrome child's 21st birthday) to wife.
|
|||||
| Lucia v. Lucia, CV010085457S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 4, 2002, Decided , February 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Matava v. Ellington Storage Ctr., CV9867519S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 4, 2002, Decided , February 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Landlord did not comply with statute in conducting auction sale of tenant's property, but there was no evidence that the tenant suffered damages as a result since no property was taken and the sale was aborted.
|
|||||
| Princeton Capital Fin. Co. v. Webster Bank, CV990590676S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 4, 2002, Decided , February 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Money could have been subject of conversion case. Duty to use care could have arisen from contract in negligence case. Negligence alone or simple contract breach absent aggravating circumstances were insufficient for Connecticut UTPA claim.
|
|||||
| Rocque v. Goodhall's Garage, CV01803983S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 4, 2002, Decided , February 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court granted environmental commissioner's motion to strike defendants' affirmative special defenses in action alleging contamination. Acts of God, apportionment, and inaccuracy of commissioner's facts were not defenses to strict liability.
|
|||||
| S.A. Candelora Enters. v. Wild, CV010447877S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 4, 2002, Decided , February 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court, inter alia, denied business sellers' motion to strike buyer's intentional tort claims since economic loss doctrine did not bar intentional torts where parties had privity, a five-year covenant not to compete.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
