 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hous. Auth. of Meriden v. Beltran, NNICV064006668,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, HOUSING SESSION, February 6, 2007, Decided , February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied tenant's motion to dismiss alleging that the landlord did not provide tenant with a sufficiently specific notice to quit pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47a-15; landlord's claim that eviction was proper due to the tenant's inappropriate sexual conduct resulting in serious nuisance was sufficiently specific notice to the tenant.
|
|||||
| In re Shi-Ayn M., T11CP04012045A, Opinion No.: 97066,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 6, 2007, Decided , February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A fair preponderance of the evidence showed that the cause for a child's commitment no longer existed and that it was in the child's best interest to revoke the commitment. However, there was not sufficient cooperation between the parents to justify joint legal custody.
|
|||||
| Kj Builders v. Windsor Locks Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV064020476S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 6, 2007, Decided , February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because only one neighbor demonstrated aggrievement, and the record clearly demonstrated that the site plan and special use approval complied with the town's zoning regulations, the neighbors' appeals were dismissed.
|
|||||
| Krane v. Krane, AC 27359,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 6, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wording of parties' agreement as to alimony was clear and unambiguous that the husband did not receive the benefit of the deductions taken by his subchapter S corporation. Trial court correctly ruled that the wording of the agreement "in plain English" meant that the husband did not receive the benefit of the deductions taken by the corporation.
|
|||||
| Moncuse v. Small Steps, LLC, DBDCV065001218,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 6, 2007, Decided , February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied the buyers' application for prejudgment remedy on their complaint for money damages for the sellers' refusal to go through with property sale after the buyers could not meet a mortgage contingency in the relevant agreements; there existed no credible evidence of a fraudulent conveyance and breach of contract was not shown.
|
|||||
| Morales v. Comm'r of Corr., AC 27140,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 6, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus was dismissed because he failed to show that he was incorrectly advised by his counsel that he would be released from prison in nine years. He also failed to show that the lower court's denial of the inmate's petition for certification to appeal was an abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
| Popick v. Maloof, FA990069628S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 6, 2007, Decided , February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court found it was in a minor child's best interests under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-56 to have a relationship with his father if, and only if, the father could, inter alia, control his obsessive involvement with his son; the father was ordered to have additional therapy before visitation could be reinstated.
|
|||||
| Riccio v. Harbour Vill. Condo. Ass'n, SC 17641,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 6, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly directed a verdict in favor of a condominium association, in a resident's personal injury action based on her slip and fall on ice on the condominium property, as the resident failed to establish that the association had notice of the ice and take reasonable steps to remove the ice after such notice.
|
|||||
| Rivers v. City of New Britain, AC 27560,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 6, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City was properly granted summary judgment in a pedestrian's personal injury suit, as Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-163a protected it from liability for her slip and fall on a sidewalk abutting state property, the city did not own the land abutting the sidewalk, and was not in possession or control of it. Thus, it had no duty to keep the sidewalk safe.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
