 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rodriquez v. Warden, CV000437060S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 6, 2007, Decided , February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for habeas corpus was denied as confession precluded claim of actual innocence and counsel could not have been ineffective for failing to present alibi defense that did not exist; evidence showed defendant could not have been at hospital with girlfriend at time of shooting as girlfriend checked into hospital 40 minutes after the shooting.
|
|||||
| Schlett v. Schlett, NNIFA054004354S, Opinion No.: 97090,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 6, 2007, Decided , February 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father was ordered to pay a mother $ 169 per week in child support. Amount had been adjusted under Conn. Agencies Regs. § 46b-215a-3(b)(3)(A) from the presumptive guidelines amount because the father would incur significant visitation expenses traveling from Texas to Connecticut to visit the minor children of the parties.
|
|||||
| State v. Burroughs, AC 26095,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 6, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's drug convictions were reversed as evidence should have been suppressed since it was obtained after illegal seizure of defendant under Fourth Amendment and Conn. Const. art. I, §§ 7 and 9 since police witnessed no suspicious or criminal activity that would warrant further investigation after they investigated an anonymous tip.
|
|||||
| Stein v. Horton, AC 26781,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 6, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for defendants was affirmed as plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim was barred by res judicata because first suit for breach of contract had been dismissed with prejudice that involved same parties, or parties in privity with parties in original action, and unjust enrichment suit was not initiated under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-292(a).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
