 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alco Std. Corp. v. Charnas, (AC 19253),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 8, 2000, officially released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly rendered because there was no genuine issue of material fact where the clear and unambiguous language of a promissory note did not require notice of default for failure to make payment.
|
|||||
| Ex rel. Amneris P., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 8, 2000, Decided , February 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When the natural father had abandoned his daughter, the mother was not capable of parenting her, and child was attached to foster mother seeking to adopt her, termination of parental rights was in the child's best interests.
|
|||||
| In re Antonio M., (AC 18812),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 8, 2000, officially released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed the termination of respondent's parental rights, finding no reversible error.
|
|||||
| Leshine v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Guilford, CV 980418616,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 8, 2000, Decided , February 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The parking area zoning permit was not subject to the coverage requirements of the zoning regulations. Zoning enforcement officer did not issue a permit to construct garage and accessory apartment; thus, appeal was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Macek v. J.G.V.S. Inc., CV 990592091,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, February 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A franchisee who sought injunctive relief to prevent termination of his franchise was bound to observe his end of the franchise agreement.
|
|||||
| Perrelli v. Strathmore Farms Assoc., CV 960254335S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 8, 2000, Decided , February 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claim against real estate development corporation was time barred since plaintiffs' action was commenced more than three years from the date the real estate development corporation relinquished control of the association.
|
|||||
| Pitchell v. City of Hartford, CV 940538582S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, February 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Queach Corp. v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n of Branford, CV 990430746,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to intervene by movants was granted, where motion was timely, and movants' interest in the outcome was sufficient to warrant granting them intervenor status.
|
|||||
| Sigel v. Bella, CV 970142423S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in contract action granted because there was no genuine issue of material fact where plaintiff failed to respond to request for admissions within prescribed period; thus, payment was conclusively established.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
