Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Connecticut - February 9, 2004

  
Coburn v. Newtown Conservation Comm'n, CV030347802S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 9, 2004, Decided , February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A wetlands permitting agency did not commit error by receiving ex parte evidence in approving a permit application where it was shown that the evidence did not alter its decision.

Search Cases for Free

  
DePrimo v. Chiarelli, CV010454691S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 9, 2004, Decided , February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Motion to strike claims in action by a client against his attorneys was granted; client failed to establish a public policy breach in support of his bad faith claim and he failed to show that the attorneys' conduct fell below the standard of care.

Search Cases for Free

  
Dickman v. Generis, CV030825345S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 9, 2004, Decided , February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Heir had standing to bring claims arising out of the actions of a fiduciary of an estate and of a trustee of a trust, as there had been fraud and collusion, and the heir's interests were antagonistic to those of the personal representatives.

Search Cases for Free

  
Giannamore v. Shevchuk, CV010164079S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Allegations homeowner, public defender, attempted to obtain favorable settlement of dispute by using friendship with assistant state's attorney and judge to obtain warrant for arrest on charges of larceny did not support UTPA or IIED claims.

Search Cases for Free

  
In re DR, CP01002554A, CP01002555A, CP0100256A, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, February 9, 2004, Decided , February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because of the mother's inability to function as a parent, and not because of her deportation to her home country following her conviction and sentence, the trial court terminated her parental rights for failure to achieve rehabilitation.

Search Cases for Free

  
Int'l Brands United States v. Dombrowski, CV030826749S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 9, 2004, Decided , February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: An agreement between an importer and a woodworker for the manufacture of an advertising display unit was unenforceable because it was not in writing, as required by the Statute of Frauds, and there was no agreement as to the prototype or quantity.

Search Cases for Free

  
Killian v. Killian, FA020394356S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Parties' marriage was dissolved. The husband was deemed to be at greater fault for the dissolution due to his extra-marital affairs. The wife's claim to a portion of the husband's inheritance from his father and sister was denied.

Search Cases for Free

  
Makepeace v. Makepeace, FA960538570S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where substantial changes in circumstances authorized it, the court modified an order of child custody and support to allow the father to take the tax deduction for a minor child and to require the mother to pay weekly child support.

Search Cases for Free

  
Marini v. Marini, FA970346044S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 9, 2004, Decided , February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where an ex-husband's only showing of changed circumstances was a slight increase in both parties' take home pay, he failed to show changed circumstances sufficient to authorize the court to alter its alimony order.

Search Cases for Free

  
Miceli v. Harasimowicz, FA940390647S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 9, 2004, Decided , February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top