 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Chamberland v. Physicians for Women's Health, LLC, CV010164040S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case alleging that doctors failed to inform parents of a test to determine the risk of a birth defect, an award of seven million dollars in non-economic damages was upheld because the law in Connecticut permitted damages for emotional distress in wrongful birth cases where the distress was a direct and proximate result of the negligence.
|
|||||
| Fisher v. Yale Univ., (X10)NNHCV044003207S (CLD),
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW HAVEN, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motions to strike were granted because it was plain that the alleged injuries either were purely emotional or were physical manifestations of emotional injuries, and therefore could not provide the basis for negligence causes of action.
|
|||||
| Gosselin v. Gosselin, FA990117793S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After a husband met his burden of showing that the continuation of the order of alimony would be unfair and improper, through a decrease in his income, and an increase of both the wife's income and the value of her assets, modification of the alimony amount was granted. Further, as he became current on his arrears, a motion for contempt was denied.
|
|||||
| Hill v. Warden, State Prison, CV040004387S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The granting of an inmate's petition for a writ of habeas corpus was proper pursuant to the Sixth Amendment and Conn. Const. art. I, § 8 where the inmate's attorney testified that the inmate signed the notice of appeal form and that the attorney told the inmate that he would file the notice of appeal but failed to do so.
|
|||||
| Kelley v. Tkach, CV030403610S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff showed that tractor trailer operator's negligence in driving his tractor trailer, causing it to collide with plaintiff's vehicle, was the proximate cause of plaintiff's shoulder injury. Testimony showed that plaintiff visited a doctor six days after the accident complaining of shoulder pain and was eventually diagnosed with a labrum tear.
|
|||||
| Ketchian v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., CV020395856S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Injured party's motion for additur of non-economic damages was granted under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 16-35 and Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-228b as jury's award was inconsistent with findings that injured party would require additional surgery and award of costs of future surgery in economic damages award.
|
|||||
| Ketchian v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., CV020395856S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Driver's motion for a post-verdict collateral source reduction pursuant to Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 16-35 and Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-225a was denied as driver did not request interrogatories and it was uncertain how much was awarded for future medical expenses and how was allocated to past medical expenses and lost wages.
|
|||||
| Mangiante v. Niemiec, CV000598525S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Osuba v. Electro-Flex Heat, CV044001083S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
