 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Silber v. Carotenuto & Sons, CV 980416562,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment granted on contract claim where plaintiff did not show control necessary to pierce corporate veil; summary judgment denied on negligence claim where corporate officer status did not affect tort liability.
|
|||||
| State v. Hannon, (AC 18208),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 8, 2000, officially released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed defendant's conviction, holding that the causation instructions were legally correct and that it was not reasonably possible that the jury was misled.
|
|||||
| State v. Mitchell, (AC 18366),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 8, 2000, officially released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No standing existed to invoke Fourth Amendment rights when there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in friend's apartment because defendant was not overnight guest, not invited by resident, and had not recently been to apartment.
|
|||||
| State v. Quinones, (AC 18412),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 8, 2000, officially released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed defendant's convictions because he did not preserve his constitutional claim or request Golding review, and no Secondino missing witness instruction was necessary under recent state supreme court case law.
|
|||||
| State v. Soeun Kim Pin, (AC 18644),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 8, 2000, officially released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction affirmed; plenary review of trial court's determination of voluntariness did not support a finding that defendant's will was overborne.
|
|||||
| State v. Thomas, (AC 18512),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 8, 2000, officially released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's reckless endangerment conviction reversed because there was no evidence that defendant's action of firing his pistol into the ground created a risk of physical injury to someone other than the defendant.
|
|||||
| Statewide Griev. Comm. v. Solomon, CV 990269373S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 8, 2000, Decided , February 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Disciplinary action against attorney alleging violation of Rules of Professional Conduct by making mortgage loan in violation of statute made out prima facie case; scienter was not required to establish ethical violation.
|
|||||
| Suffield Dev. Assocs. v. National Loan Investors L.P., CV 990590031S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, February 8, 2000, Decided , February 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A partnership's complaint against another partnership was stricken for failing to allege abuse of process, fraud, tortious interference with contractual relations, or violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act.
|
|||||
| Thomas v. Warden, CV 982745,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 8, 2000, Decided , February 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court dismissed petitioner's habeas action since his arguments regarding the calculation of his good time credits were wholly lacking in merit.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
