|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 19, 2002
|
| |
FWA, L.L.C v. Frank, CV0195616,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 19, 2002, Decided , March 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Hunter v. Olschelski, CV010276707S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, March 19, 2002, Decided , March 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The injured party however, had not alleged any facts to support his assertion that he was a third-party beneficiary. Thus, he failed to show the insurer owed him a duty to deal with him in good faith and fairly, pursuant to the policy.
|
|
| |
In re Kayla P., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, JUVENILE MATTERS AT MIDDLETOWN, March 19, 2002, Decided , March 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Termination of mother's parental rights was in best interest of all three children. Father consented to termination of his parental rights to his daughter.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Keeys v. Keeys, FA930355163S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 19, 2002, Decided , March 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Since cohabitation did not automatically terminate wife's right to alimony, and alimony could not be retroactively modified, husband's motion to terminate alimony retroactively from date wife began residing with another person was denied.
|
|
| |
Liquore v. Assurance Co. of Am., X04CV010124151S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW LONDON, March 19, 2002, Decided , March 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Insured did not sufficiently allege bad faith and had no cause of action under unfair insurance practices act. Because he addressed other unfair trade practices, he did not have to assert general business practices.
|
|
| |
Lopez v. Kruy, CV990265855S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, March 19, 2002, Decided , March 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court denied landlords' motion for summary judgment in tenant's wife's suit alleging negligence and nuisance from the landlords' failure to fix narrow stair treads in their apartment since landlords did not show they had no control of apartment.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback