 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Penna v. Margolis, CV030475408S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 9, 2004, Decided , February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' motion to disqualify an attorney was granted; it was likely that the attorney would be a necessary witness for plaintiffs in a legal malpractice action, as the attorney also represented plaintiffs in the underlying action.
|
|||||
| Russack-Baker v. Billings P. Learned Mission, 566008,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Allegations that when hired, an employee received a handbook outlining termination procedures, were sufficient to support the existence of either an implied or express contract and a claim of breach of contract for failure to follow the procedure.
|
|||||
| Scappatura v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., CV020346795S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 9, 2004, Decided , February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was entered for an insurance company in case brought by injured person seeking UM/UIM coverage where the policy provided for notice of UM/UIM claim within three years of accident and notice given by injured person was untimely.
|
|||||
| Smith v. Muellner, CV030102009S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 9, 2004, Decided , February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the dominant landowners lacked an adequate remedy at law and the balance of the potential harms favored them, the court granted a temporary injunction and ordered the removal of a fence along a driveway.
|
|||||
| Socha v. Bordeau, 122572,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A neighbor's riparian rights in certain lake waters did not give him the right to use the lake bottom, which was owned by another, for the construction of docks and in doing so, the neighbor was trespassing on the owner's land.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
