Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Connecticut - February 9, 2004

  
Nano v. Nano, FA890263362S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Penna v. Margolis, CV030475408S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 9, 2004, Decided , February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendants' motion to disqualify an attorney was granted; it was likely that the attorney would be a necessary witness for plaintiffs in a legal malpractice action, as the attorney also represented plaintiffs in the underlying action.

Search Cases for Free

  
Russack-Baker v. Billings P. Learned Mission, 566008, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Allegations that when hired, an employee received a handbook outlining termination procedures, were sufficient to support the existence of either an implied or express contract and a claim of breach of contract for failure to follow the procedure.

Search Cases for Free

  
Scappatura v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., CV020346795S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 9, 2004, Decided , February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Summary judgment was entered for an insurance company in case brought by injured person seeking UM/UIM coverage where the policy provided for notice of UM/UIM claim within three years of accident and notice given by injured person was untimely.

Search Cases for Free

  
Smith v. Muellner, CV030102009S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 9, 2004, Decided , February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Since the dominant landowners lacked an adequate remedy at law and the balance of the potential harms favored them, the court granted a temporary injunction and ordered the removal of a fence along a driveway.

Search Cases for Free

  
Socha v. Bordeau, 122572, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, February 9, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A neighbor's riparian rights in certain lake waters did not give him the right to use the lake bottom, which was owned by another, for the construction of docks and in doing so, the neighbor was trespassing on the owner's land.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top