|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 7, 2005
|
| |
Messier v. Label, CV030071886,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, February 7, 2005, Decided , February 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where an injured person was injured at a health club while using a running board, the health club was entitled to summary judgment in regard to her negligence claim since she signed a release of liability which specifically referred to negligence.
|
|
| |
One Way Fare v. Dep't of Consumer Prot., CV040525451S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because criminal intent need not be proven to establish statutory violation, the defense of entrapment, Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 53a-15, was available to a restaurant in administrative proceeding involving sale of alcohol to a minor in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 30-86. However, the minor's simple act of ordering a beer did not amount to inducement.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Tel Comm Techs., Inc. v. Gasoline & Auto. Serv. Dealers of Am., Inc., CV040409872S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 7, 2005, Decided , February 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the pay telephone corporation was not the owner of an unscheduled claim that had not been abandoned back to it, it had no standing to assert it; accordingly no court had subject matter jurisdiction to entertain the claim. Thus, its action, which alleged, inter alia, intentional interference with contractual rights, was dismissed.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback