 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ponzillo v. Miller, CV054003628,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owner's action alleging negligence and damage to her property caused by blasting done on a neighboring owner's property by a contractor was barred by both Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 52-584 and 52-577 because the complaint, which alleged dates of blasting, was not served on defendants within three years from the last date of blasting.
|
|||||
| Prego v. Falcioni, CV020280472S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was rendered for a driver in her suit against a town and the town's employee to recover for damages sustained as result of car accident involving driver and employee. Driver proved the employee's negligence in failing to yield right of way to driver's vehicle and also proved that she had sustained some injury as a result of the collision.
|
|||||
| Sandler v. Glasberg, FSTCV020188038,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an appeal was dismissed by the appellate court, a trial referee's report and the trial court's prior judgment were the law of the case, and a claim for new and different relief was not authorized or warranted; the parties were ordered to release their lis pendens and the owners were ordered to pay the neighbor for certain easements.
|
|||||
| Spring v. Dias, CV044000110S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court had to dismiss the first trustee's action against the second trustee for order to dispose of trust property as the second trustee and a third trustee did not want to do so; trial court, pursuant to Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 10-33, lacked jurisdiction over matter since the decision not to sell was not an abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
