 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alexis v. Administrator, CV000177642,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 5, 2001, Decided , February 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff did not file motion for the correction of the finding. Thus, board's determination that claimant was denied unemployment benefits because he committed willful misconduct by improperly using a coupon was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Corona v. Pig, Inc., CV970572794S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 5, 2001, Decided , February 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants, bar and others, were granted summary judgment on plaintiffs' claim for improper furnishing of alcohol where no allegations or evidence supported the conclusion of reckless or wanton misconduct.
|
|||||
| Defina v. Defina, FA990336800,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 5, 2001, Decided , February 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Divorce granted; defendant was ordered to pay alimony, the parties were permitted to divide personal property as agreed, they were ordered to sell the marital home, and they were directed to convert a piece of real property to tenants in common.
|
|||||
| Doe v. Julia Day Nursery, CV980062198S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 5, 2001, Decided , February 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court concluded that disclosure of department of family service's records and investigation reports on parents' alleged abuse was warranted and that both parties were entitled to the information, with redactions which the court made.
|
|||||
| Gatter v. Gatter, FA850310090,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, FAMILY SUPPORT MAGISTRATE DIVISION, AT HARTFORD, February 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Laches did not bar recovery of child support arrearages, because father's liability was established by court order and he suffered no prejudice from delayed enforcement; it did bar claim for unreimbursed medical expenses.
|
|||||
| Gersony v. Gersony, FA000091431,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 5, 2001, Decided , February 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The parties' marriage was dissolved because it had broken down irretrievably. The court accepted the parties' stipulation concerning the care and custody of their minor children and ordered the husband to pay child support.
|
|||||
| In re Tameeka M., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, JUVENILE MATTERS, February 5, 2001, Decided , February 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fathers' parental rights to respective daughters were terminated after mother of both girls died because neither father had visited their daughter in over three years and maintained little if any interest in their daughter.
|
|||||
| Milbauer v. City of Danbury, CV990336202S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 5, 2001, Decided , February 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant city's motion to dismiss was granted where plaintiffs failed to sustain their burden of proof in their appeal from an assessment for an extension of water mains.
|
|||||
| Terry-Dzenyuy v. Weinstein, CV980579537S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 5, 2001, Decided , February 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Jury verdict for negligence damages was found by the court to be a manifest injustice as it was so unreasonable as to be excessive. Plaintiff was ordered to remit two-thirds of the award, otherwise, the verdict was set aside.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
